2024-12-08

888: For 2 C Vectors Bundles over Same C Manifold with Boundary, Bijective C Vectors Bundle Homomorphism Is 'C Vectors Bundles - C Vectors Bundle Homomorphisms' Isomorphism

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that for 2 C vectors bundles over same C manifold with boundary, bijective C vectors bundle homomorphism is 'C vectors bundles - C vectors bundle homomorphisms' isomorphism

Topics


About: C manifold

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any 2 C vectors bundles over any same C manifold with boundary, any bijective C vectors bundle homomorphism is a 'C vectors bundles - C vectors bundle homomorphisms' isomorphism.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
M: { the C manifolds with boundary }
(E,M,π): { the C vectors bundles }
(E,M,π): { the C vectors bundles }
f: :EE, { the bijections }, such that (id:MM,f){ the C vectors bundle homomorphisms }
//

Statements:
f{ the ' C vectors bundles - C vectors bundle homomorphisms' isomorphisms }
//


2: Proof


Whole Strategy: see that (id1,f1) is a C vectors bundle homomorphism; Step 1: see that πf1=id1π; Step 2: see that f1 is C; Step 3: for each mM, see that f1|π1(m):π1(m)π1(m) is linear; Step 4: conclude the proposition.

Step 1:

As f is bijective, there is f1.

Let us see that πf1=id1π.

πf=idπ, because (id:MM,f) is a C vectors bundle homomorphism.

id1π=id1πff1=id1idπf1=πf1.

Step 2:

Step 2 Strategy: Step 2-1: around each mM, take a trivializing open subset, UmM, a trivialization, Φm:π1(Um)Um×Rk, and a trivialization, Φm:π1(Um)Um×Rk; Step 2-2: think of ΦmfΦm1, and see that it is a C bijection that is 1st-factor-preserving and 1st-factor-fixed linear; Step 2-3: conclude that ΦmfΦm1 is diffeomorphic; Step 2-4: conclude that f is diffeomorphic; Step 3: conclude the proposition.

Step 2-1:

Around each mM, let us take a trivializing open subset, UmM, a trivialization, Φm:π1(Um)Um×Rk, and a trivialization, Φm:π1(Um)Um×Rk, which is possible because while there are a trivializing open subset, Vm, for E and a trivializing open subset, Vm, for E, Um:=VmVm will do, by the proposition that any open subset of any C trivializing open subset is a C trivializing open subset.

Step 2-2:

Let us think of ΦmfΦm1:Um×RkUm×Rk.

We are going to see that it is diffeomorphic, using the proposition that for any C manifold with boundary and any 2 real finite-dimensional vectors spaces turned C manifolds, any C bijection from the product of the manifold with boundary and the former vectors space onto the product of the manifold with boundary and the latter vectors space that is 1st-factor-preserving and 1st-factor-fixed-linear is a diffeomorphism. Step 2-2 is about seeing that ΦmfΦm1 satisfies the requirements for the proposition. "1st-factor-preserving" and "1st-factor-fixed-linear" hereafter means what are meant in the proposition.

Um is a C manifold with boundary, by Note for the definition of open submanifold with boundary of C manifold with boundary.

Note the proposition that for any map between any embedded submanifolds with boundary of any C manifolds with boundary, Ck-ness does not change when the domain or the codomain is regarded to be the subset.

ΦmfΦm1 is bijective, because Φm1:Um×Rkπ1(Um) is bijective, f|π1(Um):π1(Um)π1(Um) is bijective: f is fiber-preserving and is 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphic (so, bijective) on each fiber, and Φm:π1(Um)Um×Rk is bijective.

ΦmfΦm1 is C, by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any C manifolds with boundary Ck at corresponding points, where k includes , the composition is Ck at the point.

ΦmfΦm1 is 1st-factor-preserving, because Φm1 maps {p}×Rk into π1(p), f maps π1(p) into π1(p), and Φm maps π1(p) into {p}×Rk.

ΦmfΦm1 is 1st-factor-fixed linear, because Φm1|{p}×Rk is linear into π1(p), f|π1(p) is linear into π1(p), and Φm|π1(p) is linear into {p}×Rk.

Step 2-3:

So, by the proposition that for any C manifold with boundary and any 2 real finite-dimensional vectors spaces turned C manifolds, any C bijection from the product of the manifold with boundary and the former vectors space onto the product of the manifold with boundary and the latter vectors space that is 1st-factor-preserving and 1st-factor-fixed-linear is a diffeomorphism, ΦmfΦm1 is diffeomorphic.

So, (ΦmfΦm1)1=Φmf1Φm1 is C.

Step 2-4:

Then, f1=Φm1Φmf1Φm1Φm is C, by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any C manifolds with boundary Ck at corresponding points, where k includes , the composition is Ck at the point.

So, f is a diffeomorphism.

Step 3:

For each mM, let us see that f1|π1(m):π1(m)π1(m) is linear.

As f is fiber-preserving and bijective, f1|π1(m) is the inverse of f|π1(m):π1(m)π1(m), which is linear by the definition of C vectors bundle homomorphism. By the proposition that any bijective linear map is a 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphism, f|π1(m) is a 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphism, and so, f1|π1(m) is linear.

Step 4:

So, (id1,f1) is a C vectors bundle homomorphism.

So, (id,f) is a 'C vectors bundles - C vectors bundle homomorphisms' isomorphism.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>