description/proof of that for 2
Topics
About:
The table of contents of this article
Starting Context
-
The reader knows a definition of
vectors bundle of rank . - The reader knows a definition of bijection.
- The reader knows a definition of %structure kind name% homomorphism.
- The reader knows a definition of %category name% isomorphism.
-
The reader knows a definition of
map between arbitrary subsets of manifolds with boundary, where includes . -
The reader knows a definition of open submanifold with boundary of
manifold with boundary. -
The reader admits the proposition that any open subset of any
trivializing open subset is a trivializing open subset. -
The reader admits the proposition that for any
manifold with boundary and any 2 real finite-dimensional vectors spaces turned manifolds, any bijection from the product of the manifold with boundary and the former vectors space onto the product of the manifold with boundary and the latter vectors space that is 1st-factor-preserving and 1st-factor-fixed-linear is a diffeomorphism. -
The reader admits the proposition that for any map between any embedded submanifolds with boundary of any
manifolds with boundary, -ness does not change when the domain or the codomain is regarded to be the subset. -
The reader admits the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any
manifolds with boundary at corresponding points, where includes , the composition is at the point. - The reader admits the proposition that any bijective linear map is a 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphism.
Target Context
-
The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any 2
vectors bundles over any same manifold with boundary, any bijective vectors bundle homomorphism is a ' vectors bundles - vectors bundle homomorphisms' isomorphism.
Orientation
There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.
There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.
Main Body
1: Structured Description
Here is the rules of Structured Description.
Entities:
//
Statements:
//
2: Proof
Whole Strategy: see that
Step 1:
As
Let us see that
Step 2:
Step 2 Strategy: Step 2-1: around each
Step 2-1:
Around each
Step 2-2:
Let us think of
We are going to see that it is diffeomorphic, using the proposition that for any
Note the proposition that for any map between any embedded submanifolds with boundary of any
Step 2-3:
So, by the proposition that for any
So,
Step 2-4:
Then,
So,
Step 3:
For each
As
Step 4:
So,
So,