2024-10-20

824: For Map Between Embedded Submanifolds with Boundary of C Manifolds with Boundary, Ck-ness Does Not Change When Domain or Codomain Is Regarded to Be Subset

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that for map between embedded submanifolds with boundary of C manifolds with boundary, Ck-ness does not change when domain or codomain is regarded to be subset

Topics


About: C manifold

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any map between any embedded submanifolds with boundary of any C manifolds with boundary, Ck-ness does not change when the domain or the codomain is regarded to be the subset.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
M1: { the C manifolds with boundary }
M2: { the C manifolds with boundary }
M1: { the embedded submanifolds with boundary of M1}
ι1: :M1M1, = the inclusion 
M2: { the embedded submanifolds with boundary of M2}
ι2: :M2M2, = the inclusion 
f1: :M1M2
f2: :M1ι2(M2)M2, =f1 with the codomain replaced
f3: :ι1(M1)M1M2, =f1 with the domain replaced
f4: :ι1(M1)M1ι2(M2)M2, =f1 with the domain and the codomain replaced
//

Statements:
f1{ the Ck maps }

f2{ the Ck maps }

f3{ the Ck maps }

f4{ the Ck maps }
//


2: Note


This proposition is not so trivial: for example, Ck-ness of f1 is judged with respect to the atlas of M1 and the atlas of M2 while Ck-ness of f4 is judged with respect to the atlas of M1 and the atlas of M2.

This proposition requires M1 and M2 to be embedded, not more generally immersed.


3: Proof


Whole Strategy: let ιj:Mjιj(Mj)Mj be the codomain restriction of ιj, and for from fj to fk, express fk with fj and ι1,ι2, and use the proposition that for any C manifold with boundary and any embedded submanifold with boundary, the inverse of the codomain restricted inclusion is C; Step 1: express f2,f3,f4 with f1 and ι1,ι2, express f1,f3,f4 with f2 and ι1,ι2, express f1,f2,f4 with f3 and ι1,ι2, and express f1,f2,f3 with f4 and ι1,ι2; Step 2: see that ι11 and ι21 are C; Step 3: conclude the proposition.

Step 1:

Let ι1:M1ι1(M1)M1 be the codomain restriction of ι1.

ι1 is C, by the proposition that for any map between any arbitrary subsets of any C manifolds with boundary Ck at any point, where k includes , the restriction or expansion on any codomain that contains the range is Ck at the point.

Let ι2:M2ι2(M2)M2 be the codomain restriction of ι2.

ι2 is C, by the proposition that for any map between any arbitrary subsets of any C manifolds with boundary Ck at any point, where k includes , the restriction or expansion on any codomain that contains the range is Ck at the point.

Let us express f2,f3,f4 with f1 and ι1 and ι2.

f2=ι2f1.

f3=f1ι11.

f4=ι2f1ι11.

Let us express f1,f3,f4 with f2 and ι1 and ι2.

f1=ι21f2.

f3=ι21f2ι11.

f4=f2ι11.

Let us express f1,f2,f4 with f3 and ι1 and ι2.

f1=f3ι1.

f2=ι2f3ι1.

f4=ι2f3.

Let us express f1,f2,f3 with f4 and ι1 and ι2.

f1=ι21f4ι1.

f2=f4ι1.

f3=ι21f4.

Step 2:

ι11 and ι21 are C, by the proposition that for any C manifold with boundary and any embedded submanifold with boundary, the inverse of the codomain restricted inclusion is C.

Step 3:

Let us suppose f1 is Ck.

f2,f3,f4 are Ck, by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any C manifolds with boundary Ck at corresponding points, where k includes , the composition is Ck at the point.

Let us suppose f2 is Ck.

f1,f3,f4 are Ck, likewise.

Let us suppose f3 is Ck.

f1,f2,f4 are Ck, likewise.

Let us suppose f4 is Ck.

f1,f2,f3 are Ck, likewise.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>