849: Composition of Embedding After Diffeomorphism or Diffeomorphism After Embedding Is Embedding
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>
description/proof of that composition of embedding after diffeomorphism or diffeomorphism after embedding is embedding
Topics
About:
manifold
The table of contents of this article
Starting Context
Target Context
-
The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that the composition of any embedding after any diffeomorphism or any diffeomorphism after any embedding is a embedding.
Orientation
There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.
There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.
Main Body
1: Structured Description
Here is the rules of Structured Description.
Entities:
:
:
:
: ,
: ,
:
: ,
: ,
:
//
Statements:
//
2: Proof
Whole Strategy: Step 1: see that is injective; Step 2: see that is ; Step 3: see that is a immersion; Step 4: see that the codomain restriction of is homeomorphic; Step 5: see that is injective; Step 6: see that is ; Step 7: see that is a immersion; Step 8: see that the codomain restriction of is homeomorphic.
Step 1:
is injective, by the proposition that any finite composition of injections is an injection: any diffeomorphism or any embedding is injective.
Step 2:
is , by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any manifolds with boundary at corresponding points, where includes , the composition is at the point.
Step 3:
Let us see that is a immersion.
For each , .
is injective (in fact, bijective) because is a diffeomorphism and is injective because is a embedding.
So, is injective, by the proposition that any finite composition of injections is an injection.
So, is a immersion.
Step 4:
Let us see that the codomain restriction of , , is a homeomorphism.
is continuous, by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subspaces of any topological spaces continuous at any corresponding points, the composition is continuous at the point.
is continuous, by the proposition that any restriction of any continuous map on the domain and the codomain is continuous.
As is a bijection ( is injective and the codomain is restricted to be surjective), there is the inverse, .
, where is the codomain restriction of .
So, , but is continuous because is a embedding and is continuous because is a diffeomorphism, and so, is continuous.
Step 5:
is injective, by the proposition that any finite composition of injections is an injection: any embedding or any diffeomorphism is injective.
Step 6:
is , by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any manifolds with boundary at corresponding points, where includes , the composition is at the point.
Step 7:
Let us see that is a immersion.
For each , .
is injective because is a embedding and is injective (in fact, bijective) because is a diffeomorphism.
So, is injective, by the proposition that any finite composition of injections is an injection.
So, is a immersion.
Step 8:
Let us see that the codomain restriction of , , is a homeomorphism.
is continuous, by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subspaces of any topological spaces continuous at any corresponding points, the composition is continuous at the point.
is continuous, by the proposition that any restriction of any continuous map on the domain and the codomain is continuous.
As is a bijection ( is injective and the codomain is restricted to be surjective), there is the inverse, .
, where is the codomain restriction of and is the domain and the codomain restriction of .
So, , but is continuous because is a diffeomorphism, by the proposition that any restriction of any continuous map on the domain and the codomain is continuous, and is continuous because is a embedding. So, is continuous.
References
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>