2024-11-03

848: For Maps Between Arbitrary Subspaces of Topological Spaces Continuous at Corresponding Points, Composition Is Continuous at Point

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that for maps between arbitrary subspaces of topological spaces continuous at corresponding points, composition is continuous at point

Topics


About: topological space

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subspaces of any topological spaces continuous at any corresponding points, the composition is continuous at the point.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
T1: { the topological spaces }
T2: { the topological spaces }
T3: { the topological spaces }
S1: { the topological subspaces of T1}
S2: { the topological subspaces of T2}
S2: { the topological subspaces of T2}, such that S2S2
S3: { the topological subspaces of T3}
p: S1
f1: :S1S2, { the maps continuous at p}
f2: :S2S3, { the maps continuous at f1(p)}
f2f1: :S1S3
//

Statements:
f2f1{ the maps continuous at p}
//


2: Note


It is crucial that S2 and S2 are regarded to be some subspaces of the same T2: if f2 is continuous with S2 regarded as a topological subspace of another topological space, T2, with the same set but with a different topology, this proposition cannot be applied.

For an obvious example, if we were allowed to choose a different topology for T2, I would choose the discrete topology for T2, which would make any f2 be continuous (any map from any discrete topological space is continuous), and the proposition would imply that for whatever f2, f2f1 would be continuous, which is of course not true.

We will sometimes call a composition of continuous maps "legitimate chain of continuous maps" when the requirements for this proposition are satisfied (when S2 and S2 are regarded to be some topological subspaces of the same T2 together with S2S2). That is because we (or at least I) tend to slip in checking the requirements.


3: Proof


Whole Strategy: take any open neighborhood of f2f1(p), Uf2f1(p)S3T3, and an open neighborhood of p, UpS1T1, such that f2f1(Up)Uf2f1(p); Step 1: take any open neighborhood of f2f1(p), Uf2f1(p)S3T3; Step 2: take an open neighborhood of f1(p), Uf1(p)S2T2, such that f2(Uf1(p))Uf2f1(p); Step 3: take Uf1(p):=Uf1(p)S2S2T2 and see that it is an open neighborhood of f1(p) on S2; Step 4: take an open neighborhood of p, UpS1T1, such that f1(Up)Uf1(p), and see that f2f1(Up)Uf2f1(p).

Step 1:

Let us take any open neighborhood of f2f1(p), Uf2f1(p)S3T3.

Step 2:

As f2 is continuous at f1(p), there is an open neighborhood of f1(p), Uf1(p)S2T2, such that f2(Uf1(p))Uf2f1(p).

Step 3:

Let us take Uf1(p):=Uf1(p)S2S2T2.

Let us see that Uf1(p) is an open neighborhood of f1(p) on S2.

As Uf1(p) is an open neighborhood of f1(p) on S2, Uf1(p)=US2 where UT2 is an open subset of T2, by the definition of subspace topology.

Uf1(p)=Uf1(p)S2=US2S2=US2, because S2S2.

That means that Uf1(p) is an open subset of S2, by the definition of subspace topology.

f1(p)Uf1(p), because f1(p)Uf1(p) and f1(p)S2.

So, Uf1(p) is an open neighborhood of f1(p) on S2.

Step 4:

As f1 is continuous at p, there is an open neighborhood of p, UpS1T1, such that f1(Up)Uf1(p).

f2f1(Up)f2(Uf1(p))f2(Uf1(p))Uf2f1(p).


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>