2026-11-01

2093: Inverse of Bijection Is Bijection

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that inverse of bijection is bijection

Topics


About: set

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that the inverse of any bijection is a bijection.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
\(S_1\): \(\in \{\text{ the sets }\}\)
\(S_2\): \(\in \{\text{ the sets }\}\)
\(f\): \(: S_1 \to S_2\), \(\in \{\text{ the bijections }\}\)
//

Statements:
\(f^{- 1}: S_2 \in S_1 \in \{\text{ the bijections }\}\)
//


2: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: see that \(f^{- 1}\) is an injection and a surjection.

Step 0:

\(f\) has certainly the inverse, by the proposition that any map is a bijection if and only if it has an inverse and the proposition that for any map, if an inverse exists, the inverse is the unique inverse.

Step 1:

\(f^{- 1}\) is an injection, because for each \(s_2, s'_2 \in S_2\) such that \(s_2 \neq s'_2\), \(f^{- 1} (s_2) \neq f^{- 1} (s'_2)\), because if \(f^{- 1} (s_2) = f^{- 1} (s'_2)\), \(f \circ f^{- 1} (s_2) = f \circ f^{- 1} (s'_2)\), but the left hand side would be \(id_{S_2} (s_2) = s_2\) and the right hand side would be \(id_{S_2} (s'_2) = s'_2\), so, \(s_2 = s'_2\), a contradiction.

\(f^{- 1}\) is a surjection, because for each \(s_1 \in S_1\), \(f (s_1) \in S_2\), and \(f^{- 1} (f (s_1)) = id_{S_1} (s_1) = s_1\).

So, \(f^{- 1}\) is a bijection.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>