2026-06-28

1847: \(1\)-Point Compactification of 2nd-Countable Locally Compact Hausdorff Topological Space Is 2nd-Countable and Metrizable

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of \(1\)-point compactification of 2nd-countable locally compact Hausdorff topological space is 2nd-countable and metrizable

Topics


About: topological space

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that the \(1\)-point compactification of any 2nd-countable locally compact Hausdorff topological space is 2nd-countable and metrizable.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
\(T\): \(\in \{\text{ the 2nd-countable locally compact Hausdorff topological spaces }\}\)
\(T^+\): \(= \text{ the 1-point compactification of } T\)
//

Statements:
\(T^+\): \(\in \{\text{ the 2nd-countable topological spaces }\} \cap \{\text{ the metrizable topological spaces }\}\)
//


2: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: take any countable basis for \(T\), \(B\), and for each compact \(K \subseteq T\), take \(U_K := T \setminus \cup_{j \in J_K} \overline{U_{k_j}}\) where \(J_K\) is a finite index set and \(U_{k_j} \in B\) such that \(\overline{U_{k_j}}\) is compact and \(K \subseteq \cup_{j \in J_K} U_{k_j}\); Step 2: see that \(B^+ := B \cup \{U_K \cup \{\infty\} \vert K \subseteq T\}\) is a countable basis for \(T^+\); Step 3: see that \(T^+\) is metrizable.

Step 1:

Let \(B\) be any countable basis for \(T\).

Let \(K \subseteq T\) be any compact subset.

Let \(k \in K\) be any.

There is a compact neighborhood of \(k\), \(K_k \subseteq T\), by the proposition that for any Hausdorff topological space, if and only if each point has a compact neighborhood, the space is locally compact.

There is an open neighborhood of \(k\), \(U_k \in B\), such that \(U_k \subseteq K_k\), by the definition of basis for topological space.

\(K_k\) is closed on \(T\), by the proposition that any compact subset of any Hausdorff topological space is closed, and \(\overline{U_k} \subseteq K_k\), where \(\overline{U_k}\) is the closure with respect to \(T\), because the closure is the intersection of all the closed subsets that contain \(U_k\), of which, \(K_k\) is one.

\(K_k\) is a compact subspace of \(T\), by the proposition that the compactness of any topological subset as a subset equals the compactness as a subspace, and \(\overline{U_k}\) is a closed subset of \(K_k\), by the proposition that any subset on any topological subspace is closed if and only if there is a closed set on the base space whose intersection with the subspace is the subset.

\(\overline{U_k}\) is a compact subset of \(K_k\), by the proposition that any closed subset of any compact topological space is compact, and is a compact subset of \(T\), by the proposition that for any topological space, any compact subset of any subspace is compact on the base space.

\(K \subseteq \cup_{k \in K} U_k\).

As \(K\) is compact, there is a finite subcover, \(\{U_{k_j} \vert j \in J_K\}\).

Let us define \(U_K := T \setminus \cup_{j \in J_K} \overline{U_{k_j}}\).

\(U_K \cup \{\infty\} \subseteq T^+\) is open, because \(U_K \cup \{\infty\} = T^+ \setminus \cup_{j \in J_K} \overline{U_{k_j}}\) and \(\cup_{j \in J_K} \overline{U_{k_j}} \subseteq T\) is compact, by the proposition that for any topological space, the union of any finite compact subsets is compact.

\(U_K \cup \{\infty\} \subseteq T^+ \setminus K\), because for each \(p \in U_K \cup \{\infty\}\), when \(p \in U_K = T \setminus \cup_{j \in J_K} \overline{U_{k_j}}\), \(p \notin \cup_{j \in J_K} \overline{U_{k_j}}\), but as \(K \subseteq \cup_{j \in J_K} U_{k_j} \subseteq \cup_{j \in J_K} \overline{U_{k_j}}\), \(p \notin K\), so, \(p \in T^+ \setminus K\), and when \(p = \infty\), \(p \in T^+ \setminus K\).

Step 2:

Let us take \(B^+ := B \cup \{U_K \cup \{\infty\} \vert K \in \{\text{ the compact subsets of } T\}\}\).

Each \(\{U_{k_j} \vert j \in J_K\}\) is a finite subset of \(B\), and \(\{\{U_{k_j} \vert j \in J_K\} \vert K \in \{\text{ the compact subsets of } T\}\} \subseteq \{\text{ the finite subsets of } B\}\): \(\{\{U_{k_j} \vert j \in J_K\} \vert K \in \{\text{ the compact subsets of } T\}\}\) does not necessarily have the number of the compact subsets of \(T\) elements, because any set has no duplication in the elements and \(\{U_{k_j} \vert j \in J_K\} = \{U_{k_j} \vert j \in J_{K'}\}\) for some \(K \neq K'\) and they are a single element.

\(\{\{U_{k_j} \vert j \in J_K\} \vert K \in \{\text{ the compact subsets of } T\}\}\) is countable, by the proposition that for any countable set, the set of the finite subsets is countable and the proposition that any subset of any countable set is countable, so, there is a bijection, \(f: \mathbb{N} \to \{\{U_{k_j} \vert j \in J_K\} \vert K \in \{\text{ the compact subsets of } T\}\}\).

There is the surjection, \(g: \{\{U_{k_j} \vert j \in J_K\} \vert K \in \{\text{ the compact subsets of } T\}\} \to \{(T \setminus \cup_{j \in J_K} \overline{U_{k_j}}) \cup \{\infty\} \vert K \in \{\text{ the compact subsets of } T\}\} = \{U_K \cup \{\infty\} \vert K \in \{\text{ the compact subsets of } T\}\}\).

So, \(g \circ f: \mathbb{N} \to \{U_K \cup \{\infty\} \vert K \in \{\text{ the compact subsets of } T\}\}\) is a surjection, by the proposition that any finite composition of surjections is a surjection, if the codomains of the constituent surjections equal the domains of the succeeding surjections, and there is a bijection, \(f': \mathbb{N} \to \{U_K \cup \{\infty\} \vert K \in \{\text{ the compact subsets of } T\}\}\), by the proposition that for any infinite set, if there is a surjection from the natural numbers set onto the set, there is a bijection from the natural numbers set onto the set.

So, \(\{U_K \cup \{\infty\} \vert K \in \{\text{ the compact subsets of } T\}\}\) is countable.

\(B^+\) is countable, by the proposition that any countable union of countable sets is countable.

Let us see that \(B^+\) is a basis for \(T^+\).

For each \(b^+ \in B^+\), \(b^+ \in B\) or \(b^+ \in \{U_K \cup \{\infty\} \vert K \in \{\text{ the compact subsets of } T\}\}\), but when \(b^+ \in B\), \(b^+\) is open on \(T\), so, is open on \(T^+\), and when \(b^+ \in \{U_K \cup \{\infty\} \vert K \in \{\text{ the compact subsets of } T\}\}\), \(b^+\) is open on \(T^+\), as has been seen above.

Let \(t^+ \in T^+\) be any.

Let \(N^+_{t^+} \subseteq T^+\) be any neighborhood of \(t^+\).

\(t^+ \in T\) or \(t^+ = \infty\).

When \(t^+ \in T\), \(N^+_{t^+} \cap T \subseteq T\) is a neighborhood of \(t^+\) on \(T\), by the proposition that for any topological space and any point on any subspace, the intersection of any neighborhood of the point on the base space and the subspace is a neighborhood on the subspace, and there is a \(U_{t^+} \in B \subseteq B^+\), such that \(t^+ \in U_{t^+} \subseteq N^+_{t^+} \cap T \subseteq N^+_{t^+}\).

When \(t^+ = \infty\), there is an open neighborhood of \(t^+\), \(U^+_{t^+} \subseteq T^+\), such that \(U^+_{t^+} \subseteq N^+_{t^+}\), but \(U^+_{t^+} = T^+ \setminus K\) for a compact \(K \subseteq T\), and \(\infty \in U_K \cup \{\infty\} \subseteq T^+ \setminus K\), as has been seen above, so, \(\infty \in U_K \cup \{\infty\} \subseteq N^+_{t^+}\) where \(U_K \cup \{\infty\} \in B^+\).

So, \(B^+\) is a basis for \(T^+\).

So, \(B^+\) is a countable basis for \(T^+\).

Step 3:

\(T^+\) is compact Hausdorff, by the proposition that for any locally compact Hausdorff topological space, the topology of the \(1\)-point compactification is the only topology that makes the \(1\)-point-augmented set compact Hausdorff with the original space as the subspace, \(T^+\) is normal, by the proposition that any compact Hausdorff topological space is normal, \(T^+\) is completely regular, by the proposition that any normal topological space is completely regular, and \(T^+\) is metrizable, by the proposition that any 2nd-countable completely regular topological space is metrizable (Urysohn metrization theorem) and Step 2.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>