1162: Subset of Manifold with Boundary That Satisfies Local-Slice-or-Half-Slice Condition Is Embedded Submanifold with Boundary with Subspace Topology and Adopting Atlas
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>
description/proof of that subset of manifold with boundary that satisfies local-slice-or-half-slice condition is embedded submanifold with boundary with subspace topology and adopting atlas
Topics
About:
manifold
The table of contents of this article
Starting Context
Target Context
-
The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that any subset of any manifold with boundary that satisfies the local-slice-or-half-slice condition is an embedded submanifold with boundary of the manifold with boundary with the subspace topology and the adopting atlas.
Orientation
There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.
There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.
Main Body
1: Structured Description
Here is the rules of Structured Description.
Entities:
:
:
: such that
//
Statements:
//
2: Proof
Whole Strategy: Step 1: see that is Hausdorff; Step 2: see that is 2nd-countable; Step 3: see that is locally topologically closed upper half Euclidean; Step 4: see that the adapting atlas is compatible; Step 5: see that the inclusion, , is a embedding.
Step 1:
is Hausdorff, by the proposition that any subspace of any Hausdorff topological space is Hausdorff.
Step 2:
is 2nd-countable, by the proposition that any subspace of any 2nd countable topological space is 2nd countable.
Step 3:
Let us see that is locally topologically closed upper half Euclidean.
Let be any.
There are an adopted chart around , , a , and a such that or .
Let us suppose that .
When is an interior chart, is a homeomorphism from the open neighborhood of on onto the open subset of , as has been seen in Note for the definition of -slice of chart domain with respect to point.
When is a boundary chart, (according to or ) is a homeomorphism from the open neighborhood of on onto the open subset of or , as has been seen in Note for the definition of -slice of chart domain with respect to point.
Let us suppose that .
When is an interior chart, is a homeomorphism from the open neighborhood of on onto the open subset of , as has been seen in Note for the definition of -half-slice of chart domain with respect to point.
When is a boundary chart, is a homeomorphism from the open neighborhood of on onto the open subset of , as has been seen in Note for the definition of -half-slice of chart domain with respect to point.
That means that is locally topologically closed upper half Euclidean: also any open subset of is allowed, as has been mentioned in Note for the definition of locally topologically closed upper half Euclidean topological space.
Step 4:
So, let be an atlas for .
Let us see that the atlas is compatible.
Let and be any charts such that .
Let us think of .
We are going to apply the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any manifolds with boundary at corresponding points, where includes , the composition is at the point, but the point is to carefully check that it is a legitimate chain of maps.
Let us suppose that .
Let us suppose that is an interior chart.
, where is a diffeomorphism.
.
Let us suppose that is a boundary chart.
, where (according to or ) is a diffeomorphism.
.
Let us suppose that .
Let us suppose that is an interior chart.
, where is a diffeomorphism.
Let us suppose that is a boundary chart.
, where (according to or ) is a diffeomorphism.
Let us suppose that .
Let us suppose that is an interior chart.
, where is a diffeomorphism.
.
Let us suppose that is a boundary chart.
, where is a diffeomorphism.
.
Let us suppose that .
Let us suppose that is an interior chart.
, where is a diffeomorphism.
Let us suppose that is a boundary chart.
, where is a diffeomorphism.
Now, let us suppose that and .
When is an interior chart and is an interior chart, .
But is from into , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any manifolds with boundary at corresponding points, where includes , the composition is at the point.
When is a boundary chart and is an interior chart, .
But is from into or , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, likewise.
When is an interior chart and is a boundary chart, .
But is from into , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, likewise.
When is a boundary chart and is a boundary chart, .
But is from into or , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, likewise.
Let us suppose that and .
When is an interior chart and is an interior chart, .
But is from into , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any manifolds with boundary at corresponding points, where includes , the composition is at the point.
When is a boundary chart and is an interior chart, .
But is from into , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, likewise.
When is an interior chart and is a boundary chart, .
But is from into , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, likewise.
When is a boundary chart and is a boundary chart, .
But is from into , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, likewise.
Let us suppose that and .
When is an interior chart and is an interior chart, .
But is from into , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any manifolds with boundary at corresponding points, where includes , the composition is at the point.
When is a boundary chart and is an interior chart, .
But is from into or , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, likewise.
When is an interior chart and is a boundary chart, .
But is from into , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, likewise.
When is a boundary chart and is a boundary chart, .
But is from into or , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, likewise.
Let us suppose that and .
When is an interior chart and is an interior chart, .
But is from into , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any manifolds with boundary at corresponding points, where includes , the composition is at the point.
When is a boundary chart and is an interior chart, .
But is from into , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, likewise.
When is an interior chart and is a boundary chart, .
But is from into , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, likewise.
When is a boundary chart and is a boundary chart, .
But is from into , is from into , and is from into , so, it is as a legitimate chain of maps, likewise.
So, is in any case.
So, the atlas is compatible.
So, is a manifold with boundary.
Step 5:
Let be the inclusion.
Let us see that is a immersion.
Let be any.
Let us choose the adopted chart, , and the corresponding adopting char, .
The components function, is like , where whether the 1st component is really or and whether the last component is really or really depend on , but anyway, it is , and its differential is injective, by the proposition that for any map between any manifolds with boundary and any corresponding charts, the components function of the differential of the map with respect to the standard bases is this, so, is a immersion.
The codomain restriction of , , is a homeomorphism, because has the subspace topology.
So, is an embedded submanifold with boundary.
References
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>