2025-06-16

1162: Subset of C Manifold with Boundary That Satisfies Local-Slice-or-Half-Slice Condition Is Embedded Submanifold with Boundary with Subspace Topology and Adopting Atlas

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that subset of C manifold with boundary that satisfies local-slice-or-half-slice condition is embedded submanifold with boundary with subspace topology and adopting atlas

Topics


About: C manifold

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that any subset of any C manifold with boundary that satisfies the local-slice-or-half-slice condition is an embedded submanifold with boundary of the manifold with boundary with the subspace topology and the adopting atlas.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
M: { the d -dimensional C manifolds with boundary }
S: M
d: N such that dd
//

Statements:
S{ the subsets of M that satisfy local-slice-or-half-slice condition with d}

S with the subspace topology and the adopting atlas { the embedded submanifolds with boundary of M}
//


2: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: see that S is Hausdorff; Step 2: see that S is 2nd-countable; Step 3: see that S is locally topologically closed upper half Euclidean; Step 4: see that the adapting atlas is C compatible; Step 5: see that the inclusion, ι:SM, is a C embedding.

Step 1:

S is Hausdorff, by the proposition that any subspace of any Hausdorff topological space is Hausdorff.

Step 2:

S is 2nd-countable, by the proposition that any subspace of any 2nd countable topological space is 2nd countable.

Step 3:

Let us see that S is locally topologically closed upper half Euclidean.

Let sS be any.

There are an adopted chart around s, (UsM,ϕs), a J{1,...,d}=(j1,...,jd), and a uUs such that UsS=SJ,u(U) or UsS=HJ,u(U).

Let us suppose that UsS=SJ,u(U).

When (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart, πJϕs|UsS:UsSUπJ(ϕs(UsS))Rd is a homeomorphism from the open neighborhood of s on S onto the open subset of Rd, as has been seen in Note for the definition of J-slice of chart domain with respect to point.

When (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart, πJϕs|UsS:UsSUπJ(ϕs(UsS))Hd or Rd (according to dJ or dJ) is a homeomorphism from the open neighborhood of s on S onto the open subset of Hd or Rd, as has been seen in Note for the definition of J-slice of chart domain with respect to point.

Let us suppose that UsS=HJ,u(U).

When (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart, πJϕs|UsS:UsSUπJ(ϕs(UsS))Hd is a homeomorphism from the open neighborhood of s on S onto the open subset of Hd, as has been seen in Note for the definition of J-half-slice of chart domain with respect to point.

When (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart, πJϕs|UsS:UsSUπJ(ϕs(UsS))Hd is a homeomorphism from the open neighborhood of s on S onto the open subset of Hd, as has been seen in Note for the definition of J-half-slice of chart domain with respect to point.

That means that S is locally topologically closed upper half Euclidean: also any open subset of Rd is allowed, as has been mentioned in Note for the definition of locally topologically closed upper half Euclidean topological space.

Step 4:

So, let {(UsSS,πJϕs|UsS)|sS} be an atlas for S.

Let us see that the atlas is C compatible.

Let (UsSS,πJϕs|UsS) and (UsSS,πJϕs|UsS) be any charts such that (UsS)(UsS).

Let us think of πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)):πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

We are going to apply the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any C manifolds with boundary Ck at corresponding points, where k includes , the composition is Ck at the point, but the point is to carefully check that it is a legitimate chain of C maps.

Let us suppose that UsS=SJ,u(U).

Let us suppose that (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart.

πJϕs|UsS=πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)ϕs|UsS, where πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd):SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)RdRd is a diffeomorphism.

(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=ϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

Let us suppose that (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart.

πJϕs|UsS=πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hdϕs|UsS, where πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd:SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)HdHdHd or Rd (according to dJ or dJ) is a diffeomorphism.

(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=ϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

Let us suppose that UsS=SJ,u(U).

Let us suppose that (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart.

πJϕs|UsS=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)ϕs|UsS, where πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd):SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)RdRd is a diffeomorphism.

Let us suppose that (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart.

πJϕs|UsS=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hdϕs|UsS, where πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd:SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)HdHdHd or Rd (according to dJ or dJ) is a diffeomorphism.

Let us suppose that UsS=HJ,u(U).

Let us suppose that (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart.

πJϕs|UsS=πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)ϕs|UsS, where πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd):HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)RdHd is a diffeomorphism.

(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=ϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

Let us suppose that (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart.

πJϕs|UsS=πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hdϕs|UsS, where πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd:HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)HdHdHd is a diffeomorphism.

(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=ϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

Let us suppose that UsS=HJ,u(U).

Let us suppose that (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart.

πJϕs|UsS=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)ϕs|UsS, where πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd):HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)RdHd is a diffeomorphism.

Let us suppose that (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart.

πJϕs|UsS=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hdϕs|UsS, where πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd:HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)HdHdHd is a diffeomorphism.

Now, let us suppose that UsS=SJ,u(U) and UsS=SJ,u(U).

When (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart and (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)ϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd) is C from SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Rd into Rd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Rd into Rd, and (πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Rd into Rd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any C manifolds with boundary Ck at corresponding points, where k includes , the composition is Ck at the point.

When (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart and (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hdϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd is C from SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)HdHd into Hd or Rd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Rd into Hd, and (πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Rd into Rd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, likewise.

When (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart and (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)ϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd) is C from SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Rd into Rd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Hd into Rd, and (πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Hd or Rd into Hd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, likewise.

When (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart and (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hdϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd is C from SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)HdHd into Hd or Rd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Hd into Hd, and (πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Hd or Rd into Hd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, likewise.

Let us suppose that UsS=HJ,u(U) and UsS=SJ,u(U).

When (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart and (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)ϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd) is C from HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Rd into Hd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Rd into Rd, and (πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Rd into Rd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any C manifolds with boundary Ck at corresponding points, where k includes , the composition is Ck at the point.

When (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart and (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hdϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd is C from HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)HdHd into Hd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Rd into Hd, and (πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Rd into Rd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, likewise.

When (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart and (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)ϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd) is C from HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Rd into Hd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Hd into Rd, and (πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Hd or Rd into Hd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, likewise.

When (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart and (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hdϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd is C from HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)HdHd into Hd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Hd into Hd, and (πJ|SJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Hd or Rd into Hd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, likewise.

Let us suppose that UsS=SJ,u(U) and UsS=HJ,u(U).

When (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart and (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)ϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd) is C from SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Rd into Rd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Rd into Rd, and (πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Hd into Rd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any C manifolds with boundary Ck at corresponding points, where k includes , the composition is Ck at the point.

When (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart and (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hdϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd is C from SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)HdHd into Hd or Rd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Rd into Hd, and (πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Hd into Rd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, likewise.

When (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart and (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)ϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd) is C from SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Rd into Rd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Hd into Rd, and (πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Hd into Hd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, likewise.

When (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart and (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hdϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd is C from SJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)HdHd into Hd or Rd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Hd into Hd, and (πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Hd into Hd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, likewise.

Let us suppose that UsS=HJ,u(U) and UsS=HJ,u(U).

When (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart and (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)ϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd) is C from HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Rd into Hd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Rd into Rd, and (πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Hd into Rd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any C manifolds with boundary Ck at corresponding points, where k includes , the composition is Ck at the point.

When (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart and (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hdϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd is C from HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)HdHd into Hd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Rd into Hd, and (πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd))1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Hd into Rd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, likewise.

When (UsM,ϕs) is an interior chart and (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)ϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd) is C from HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Rd into Hd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Hd into Rd, and (πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Hd into Hd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, likewise.

When (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart and (UsM,ϕs) is a boundary chart, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hdϕs|UsSϕs1|ϕs(UsUs)(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))=πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd(ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs))(πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)).

But πJ|HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)Hd is C from HJ,ϕs(u)(Rd)HdHd into Hd, ϕsϕs1|ϕs(UsUs) is C from ϕs(UsUs)Hd into Hd, and (πJ|HJ,ϕ(u)(Rd)Hd)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C from πJϕs((UsS)(UsS))Hd into Hd, so, it is C as a legitimate chain of C maps, likewise.

So, πJϕs|UsS(πJϕs|UsS)1|πJϕs((UsS)(UsS)) is C in any case.

So, the atlas is C compatible.

So, S is a C manifold with boundary.

Step 5:

Let ι:SM be the inclusion.

Let us see that ι is a C immersion.

Let sS be any.

Let us choose the adopted chart, (UsM,ϕs), and the corresponding adopting char, (UsSS,πJϕs|UsS).

The components function, ϕsι(πJϕs|UsS)1 is like :(xj1,...,xjd)(ϕs(u)1,...,xj1,...,xjd,...,ϕs(u)d), where whether the 1st component is really ϕs(u)1 or xj1 and whether the last component is really ϕs(u)d or xjd really depend on J, but anyway, it is C, and its differential is injective, by the proposition that for any C map between any C manifolds with boundary and any corresponding charts, the components function of the differential of the map with respect to the standard bases is this, so, ι is a C immersion.

The codomain restriction of ι, ι:Sι(S)M, is a homeomorphism, because S has the subspace topology.

So, S is an embedded submanifold with boundary.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>