2025-06-16

1168: C q-Covectors Bundle over C Manifold with Boundary

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

definition of C q-covectors bundle over C manifold with boundary

Topics


About: C manifold

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a definition of C q-covectors bundle over C manifold with boundary.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
M: { the d -dimensional C manifolds with boundary }
q: N
Λq(TM): =mMΛq(TmM)
π: :Λq(TM)M,vm, where vΛq(TmM)
(Λq(TM),M,π): { the C vectors bundle of rank dCq}
//

Conditions:
(Λq(TM),M,π){ the C subbundles of (Tq0(TM),M,π)}
//

Λq(TM) is very often implicitly identified with mMΛq(TmM:R) by the canonical bijection, f:Λq(TM)mMΛq(TmM:R),tΛq(TmM)f(t) where f is the canonical 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphism mentioned in the definition of canonical 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphism between tensors space at point on C manifold with boundary and tensors space with respect to real numbers field and p cotangent vectors spaces and q tangent vectors spaces and field.

So, although each tΛq(TM) is not really any multilinear map, f(t) is very often implicitly used instead of t.


2: Note


(Λq(TM),M,π)'s being a subbundle of (Tq0(TM),M,π) means that Λq(TM) has the subspace topology of Tq0(TM) and the adopting atlas of Tq0(TM) (which means that Λq(TM) is the embedding submanifold with boundary of Tq0(TM)).

Let us see that (Λq(TM),M,π) is indeed a subbundle of (Tq0(TM),M,π), by the proposition that for any C vectors bundle, the union of any k-dimensional vectors subspaces of the fibers that allows any local C frames is a C vectors subbundle with the subspace topology and the adopting atlas.

Note that in the following argument, we implicitly identify Λq(TM) with mMΛq(TmM:R): for example, dxj1...dxjq is really on mMΛq(TmM:R), and we really mean f1(dxj1...dxjq), but such exactitude is too hard to be maintained (and is almost never seen in the literature).

Λq(TmM) is a dCq-dimensional vectors subspace of Tq0(TmM).

For each mM, let us take any chart, (UmM,ϕm).

dxj:UmT10(TM) is a local C section for (T10(TM),M,π).

For any j1<...<jq, dxj1...dxjq is a local C section for (Tq0(TM),M,π), because =σSqsgnσdxjσ1...dxjσq , by the proposition that the wedge product of any 1-covectors is the sum of the signed reordered tensor products of the 1-covectors, and each dxjσ1...dxjσq is C.

{dxj1...dxjq|j1<...<jq} is a required set of dCq local C sections: for each mUm, {dxj1|m...dxjq|m|j1<...<jq} is a basis for Λq(TmM:R), by the proposition that the q-covectors space of any vectors space has the basis that consists of the wedge products of the increasing elements of the dual basis of the vectors space.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>