2025-04-13

1075: Linear Map from Finite-Dimensional Vectors Space with Norm Induced by Inner Product into Normed Vectors Space Is Bounded

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that linear map from finite-dimensional vectors space with norm induced by inner product into normed vectors space is bounded

Topics


About: vectors space

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that any linear map from any finite-dimensional vectors space with the norm induced by any inner product into any normed vectors space is bounded.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
F: {R,C}, with the canonical field structure
V1: { the d -dimensional F vectors spaces } with the norm, 1, induced by any inner product, ,
V2: { the F vectors spaces } with any norm, 2
f: :V1V2, { the linear maps }
//

Statements:
f{ the bounded maps }
//


2: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: take any orthonormal basis for V1, {b1,...,bd}; Step 2: evaluate f(vjbj)2.

Step 1:

As V1 has the inner product, there is an orthonormal basis for V1, {b1,...,bd}: take any basis, {b1,...,bd}, and do the Gram - Schmidt orthonormalization: b1:=1/b1,b1b1; b2:=1/b2b2,b1b1,b2b2,b1b1(b2b2,b1b1); b3=1/b3b3,b1b1b3,b2b2,b3b3,b1b1b3,b2b2(b3b3,b1b1b3,b2b2); ....

Step 2:

Let v=vjbj be any.

v12=vjbj,vjbj=j{1,...,d}|vj|2.

f(vjbj)2=vjf(bj)2|vj|f(bj)2.

Let c:=max{f(bj)2}.

f(vjbj)2j{1,...,d}|vj|c.

As j{1,...,d}|vj|2v12, j{1,...,d}|vj|dv1, by the proposition that when the sum of any n squared non-negative numbers is equal to or smaller than any squared non-negative number, the sum of the numbers is equal to or smaller than n times the number.

So, f(vjbj)2dv1c=dcv1.

As dc is a constant that does not depend on v, f is bounded.


3: Note


This proposition does not require 2 to be induced by any inner product, as Proof shows.

This proposition requires 1 to be induced by an inner product, because otherwise, orthonormal-ness would not make sense.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>