2024-12-22

918: Set Minus (Set Minus Set) Is Union of 1st Set Minus 2nd Set and Intersection of 1st Set and 3rd Set

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that set minus (set minus set) is union of 1st set minus 2nd set and intersection of 1st set and 3rd set

Topics


About: set

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that any set minus (any set minus any set) is the union of the 1st set minus the 2nd set and the intersection of the 1st set and the 3rd set.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
S1: { the sets }
S2: { the sets }
S3: { the sets }
//

Statements:
S1(S2S3)=(S1S2)(S1S3)
//


2: Natural Language Description


For any sets, S1,S2,S3, S1(S2S3)=(S1S2)(S1S3).


3: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: see that S1(S2S3)(S1S2)(S1S3); Step 2: see that (S1S2)(S1S3)S1(S2S3).

Step 1:

For any pS1(S2S3), pS1, pS2S3, pS2 or pS3, so, pS1S2 or pS1S3, so, p(S1S2)(S1S3).

Step 2:

For any p(S1S2)(S1S3), pS1, pS2 or pS3, so, pS2S3, so, pS1(S2S3).


4: Note


S1(S2S3)=(S1S2)S3 does not necessarily hold, because for example, if S3 contains a point not contained in S1, the left hand does not contain the point but the right hand side contains the point.

S1(S2S3) is not necessarily equal to but contains (S1S2)S3, as is proved in another article.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>