description/proof of that set minus (set minus set) is not necessarily but contains (1st set minus 2nd set) minus 3rd set
Topics
About: set
The table of contents of this article
- Starting Context
- Target Context
- Orientation
- Main Body
- 1: Structured Description
- 2: Natural Language Description
- 3: Proof
Starting Context
- The reader knows a definition of set.
Target Context
- The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that any set minus (any set minus any set) is not necessarily equal to but contains (the 1st set minus the 2nd set) minus the 3rd set.
Orientation
There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.
There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.
Main Body
1: Structured Description
Here is the rules of Structured Description.
Entities:
//
Statements:
not necessarily
//
2: Natural Language Description
For any sets,
3: Proof
Whole Strategy: Step 1: see an example that
Step 1:
For the 1st part, a counterexample suffices.
Let
Step 2:
For the 2nd part, for any