2024-12-22

923: For C Immersion Between C Manifolds with Boundary, Its Global Differential Is C Immersion

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that for C immersion between C manifolds with boundary, its global differential is C immersion

Topics


About: C manifold

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any C immersion between any C manifolds with boundary, its global differential is a C immersion.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
M1: { the d1 -dimensional C manifolds with boundary }
M2: { the d2 -dimensional C manifolds with boundary }
f: :M1M2, { the C immersions }
df: :TM1TM2, = the global differential 
//

Statements:
df{ the C immersions }.
//


2: Proof


Whole Strategy: do it in the 2 parts: the 1st part: M2 has the empty boundary; the 2nd part: M2 has a nonempty boundary; Step 1: suppose that M2 has the empty boundary; Step 2: around each mM1, take a chart, (UmM1,ϕm), and a chart, (Uf(m)M2,ϕf(m)), such that f^:=ϕf(m)fϕm1 is :(x1,...,xd1)(x1,...,xd1,0,...,0); Step 3: let π1:TM1M1 and π2:TM2M2 be the projections; take the induced charts, (π11(Um)TM1,ϕm~) and (π21(Uf(m))TM2,ϕf(m)~), and see that df^:=ϕf(m)~dfϕm~1 is :(v1,...,vk,x1,...,xd1)(v1,...,vk,0,...,0,x1,...,xd1,0,...,0); Step 4: see that df is a C immersion; Step 5: suppose that M2 has a nonempty boundary; Step 6: take the double of M2, D(M2), let M2~D(M2) be a regular domain diffeomorphic to M2, with a diffeomorphism, g:M2M2~, let ι~:M2~D(M2) be the inclusion, take h:=ι~gf, apply the 1st part conclusion to see that dh is a C immersion, and see that df is a C immersion.

Step 1:

Le us suppose that M2 has the empty boundary.

Step 2:

Around each mM1, let us take a chart, (UmM1,ϕm), and a chart, (Uf(m)M2,ϕf(m)), such that f(Um)Uf(m) and f^:=ϕf(m)fϕm1:ϕm(Um)ϕf(m)(Uf(m)), the coordinates function of f, is :(x1,...,xd1)(x1,...,xd1,0,...,0), which is possible by the rank theorem for C immersion (which requires M2 to be without boundary, which is the reason why we have made the supposition of Step 1).

Step 3:

Let π1:TM1M1 and π2:TM2M2 be the projections.

Let us take the induced charts, (π11(Um)TM1,ϕm~) and (π21(Uf(m))TM2,ϕf(m)~).

It is a well-known fact that df^:=ϕf(m)~dfϕm~1:ϕm~(π11(Um))ϕf(m)~(π21(Uf(m))) is :(v1,...,vd1,x1,...,xd1)(v1,...,vd1,0,...,0,x1,...,xd1,0,...,0): the components, (v1,...,vd1), are mapped to (jf^1vj,...,jf^d2vj), but f^j=xj for each 1jd1 and f^j=0 for each d1+1jd2.

So, df is C.

Step 4:

Let π1:TTM1TM1 and π2:TTM2TM2 be the projections.

There are the induced charts, (π11(π11(Um))TTM1,ϕm~~) and (π21(π21(Uf(m)))TTM2,ϕf(m)~~).

It is a well-known fact that ddf^:=ϕf(m)~~ddfϕm~~1:ϕm~~(π11(π11(Um)))ϕf(m)~~(π21(π21(Uf(m)))) is :(w1,...,w2d1,v1,...,vd1,x1,...,xd1)(w1,...,wd1,0,...,0,wd1+1,...,w2d1,0,...,0,v1,...,vd1,0,...,0,x1,...,xd1,0,...,0): the components, (w1,...,w2d1), are mapped to (jdf^1wj,...,jdf^2d2wj) where j s for 1jd1 are by vj s and j s for d1+1j2d1 are by xjd1 s, but df^j=vj for each 1jd1, df^j=0 for each d1+1jd2, df^j=xjd2 for each d2+1jd2+d1, and df^j=0 for each d2+d1+1j2d2.

That is obviously injective.

So, df is a C immersion.

Step 5:

Let us suppose that M2 has a nonempty boundary.

Step 6:

Let us take the double of M2, D(M2).

D(M2) is a C manifold without boundary that has a regular domain, M2~, that is diffeomorphic to M2.

Let a diffeomorphism be g:M2M2~.

Let ι~:M2~D(M2) be the inclusion, which is a C immersion (in fact, a C embedding), because M2~ is an embedded submanifold (in fact, a regular domain) of D(M2).

Let us think of h:M1D(M2)=ι~gf:M1M2M2~D(M2).

h is C, by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any C manifolds with boundary Ck at corresponding points, where k includes , the composition is Ck at the point.

h is a C immersion, because dh=dι~dgdf and df, dg, and dι~ are injective.

By the 1st part conclusion, dh=dι~dgdf is a C immersion, which means that ddh=ddι~ddgddf is injective on each fiber.

Then, ddf is injective on each fiber, because otherwise, the 2 vectors that were mapped to the same vector under ddf would not be mapped to any different vectors under ddh.

So, df is a C immersion.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>