923: For Immersion Between Manifolds with Boundary, Its Global Differential Is Immersion
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>
description/proof of that for immersion between manifolds with boundary, its global differential is immersion
Topics
About:
manifold
The table of contents of this article
Starting Context
Target Context
-
The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any immersion between any manifolds with boundary, its global differential is a immersion.
Orientation
There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.
There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.
Main Body
1: Structured Description
Here is the rules of Structured Description.
Entities:
:
:
: ,
: ,
//
Statements:
.
//
2: Proof
Whole Strategy: do it in the 2 parts: the 1st part: has the empty boundary; the 2nd part: has a nonempty boundary; Step 1: suppose that has the empty boundary; Step 2: around each , take a chart, , and a chart, , such that is ; Step 3: let and be the projections; take the induced charts, and , and see that is ; Step 4: see that is a immersion; Step 5: suppose that has a nonempty boundary; Step 6: take the double of , , let be a regular domain diffeomorphic to , with a diffeomorphism, , let be the inclusion, take , apply the 1st part conclusion to see that is a immersion, and see that is a immersion.
Step 1:
Le us suppose that has the empty boundary.
Step 2:
Around each , let us take a chart, , and a chart, , such that and , the coordinates function of , is , which is possible by the rank theorem for immersion (which requires to be without boundary, which is the reason why we have made the supposition of Step 1).
Step 3:
Let and be the projections.
Let us take the induced charts, and .
It is a well-known fact that is : the components, , are mapped to , but for each and for each .
So, is .
Step 4:
Let and be the projections.
There are the induced charts, and .
It is a well-known fact that is : the components, , are mapped to where s for are by s and s for are by s, but for each , for each , for each , and for each .
That is obviously injective.
So, is a immersion.
Step 5:
Let us suppose that has a nonempty boundary.
Step 6:
Let us take the double of , .
is a manifold without boundary that has a regular domain, , that is diffeomorphic to .
Let a diffeomorphism be .
Let be the inclusion, which is a immersion (in fact, a embedding), because is an embedded submanifold (in fact, a regular domain) of .
Let us think of .
is , by the proposition that for any maps between any arbitrary subsets of any manifolds with boundary at corresponding points, where includes , the composition is at the point.
is a immersion, because and , , and are injective.
By the 1st part conclusion, is a immersion, which means that is injective on each fiber.
Then, is injective on each fiber, because otherwise, the 2 vectors that were mapped to the same vector under would not be mapped to any different vectors under .
So, is a immersion.
References
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>