2024-12-08

892: Composition of Map After Preimage Is Identical if Map Is Surjective w.r.t. Argument Subset

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that composition of map after preimage is identical if map is surjective w.r.t. argument subset

Topics


About: set

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any map between any sets, the composition of the map after the preimage of any subset of the codomain is identical if the map is surjective with respect to the argument subset.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
S1: { the sets }
S2: { the sets }
f: :S1S2
S2: S2
//

Statements:
pS2(pf(S1))

ff1(S2)=S2
//

When f is a surjection, the condition is satisfied for any subset of S2.


2: Natural Language Description


For any sets, S1,S2, any map, f:S1S2, and any subset, S2S2, if f is surjective with respect to S2, which means that any point on S2 is in the range of f, ff1(S2)=S2.

When f is a surjection, f is surjective with respect to any subset of S2.


3: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: see that ff1(S2)S2 in general; Step 2: suppose that pS2(pf(S1)), and see that S2ff1(S2).

Step 1:

ff1(S2)S2, by the proposition that for any map between sets, the composition of the map after any preimage is contained in the argument set.

So, it is about S2ff1(S2).

Step 2:

Let us see that S2ff1(S2).

Let us suppose that pS2(pf(S1)).

For any pS2, there is a pf1(p)f1(S2). p=f(p)ff1(p)ff1(S2).


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>