2024-07-29

708: For Map from Subset of C Manifold with Boundary into Subset of C Manifold Ck at Point, There Is Ck Extension on Open-Neighborhood-of-Point Domain

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that for map from subset of C manifold with boundary into subset of C manifold Ck at point, there is Ck extension on-open-neighborhood-of-point domain

Topics


About: C manifold

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any map from any subset of any C manifold with boundary into any subset of any C manifold Ck at any point, there is a Ck extension on an open-neighborhood-of-the-point domain.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
M1: { the d1 -dimensional C manifolds with boundary }
M2: { the d2 -dimensional C manifolds }
S1: M1
S2: M2
p: S1
f: :S1S2, { the Ck maps at p}, where k(N{0}){}
//

Statements:
Up{ the open neighborhoods of p on M1},Uf(p){ the open neighborhoods of f(p) on M2},f~:UpUf(p){ the Ck maps }(f~|UpS1=f|UpS1)
//


2: Natural Language Description


For any d1-dimensional C manifold with boundary, M1, any d2-dimensional C manifold, M2, any subset, S1M1, any subset, S2M2, any point, pS1, and any map Ck at p, where k(N{0}){}, f:S1S2, there are an open neighborhood of p, UpM1, an open neighborhood of f(p), Uf(p)M2, and a Ck map, f~:UpUf(p), such that f~|UpS1=f|UpS1.


3: Note


M2 is without boundary, which is necessary for this proposition, which is the reason why the conclusion of this proposition cannot be adopted as a definition of map between arbitrary subsets of C manifolds with boundary Ck at point.


4: Proof


Whole Strategy: while the definition of Ck-ness at point is about having a chart on M1 and a chart on M2 and a Ck extension of the coordinates function, f, f~ is constructed based on f, but for that, the charts need to be chosen specifically; Step 1: take a chart around p, (UpM1,ϕp), a chart around f(p), (Uf(p)M2,ϕf(p)), and a Ck extension of the coordinates function, f:Uϕp(p)Rd2, according to a definition of map between arbitrary subsets of C manifolds with boundary Ck at point, where k excludes 0 and includes , with the conditions that ϕf(p)(Uf(p))=Rd2 and ϕp(Up)Uϕp(p); Step 2: define Up:=Up and f~:UpUf(p):=ϕf(p)1fϕp; Step 3: see that f~ satisfies the necessary conditions.

Step 1:

There is a chart, (Uf(p)M2,ϕf(p)), such that ϕf(p)(Uf(p))=Rd2, by the proposition that for any C manifold with boundary, any interior point has a chart whose range is the whole Euclidean space and any boundary point has a chart whose range is the whole half Euclidean space.

While Uf(p)S2 is an open neighborhood of f(p) on S2, as f is continuous at p as is described in Note for the definition of map between arbitrary subsets of C manifolds with boundary Ck at point, where k excludes 0 and includes , there is an open neighborhood of p, UpS1S1, such that f(UpS1)Uf(p)S2Uf(p). There is a chart, (UpM1,ϕp), such that UpUp. f(UpS1)f(UpS1)Uf(p).

By the proposition that for any map between any arbitrary subsets of any C manifolds with boundary Ck at any point, where k excludes 0 and includes , any pair of domain chart around the point and codomain chart around the corresponding point such that the intersection of the domain chart and the domain is mapped into the codomain chart satisfies the condition of the definition, the pair of (UpM1,ϕp) and (Uf(p)M2,ϕf(p)) satisfies the condition of the definition.

Furthermore, let us take Up as such that ϕp(Up)Uϕp(p) as is described in the definition of map between arbitrary subsets of C manifolds with boundary Ck at point, where k excludes 0 and includes .

Now we have a Ck extension of the coordinates function, f:Uϕp(p)Rd2.

Step 2:

Let us define Up:=Up and f~:UpUf(p):=ϕf(p)1fϕp, which is valid, because the domain of ϕp is Up, the codomain of ϕp, ϕp(Up), is contained in the domain of f, Uϕp(p), the codomain of f, Rd2, is contained in the domain of ϕf(p)1, Rd2, and the codomain of ϕf(p)1 is Uf(p).

Step 3:

Let us see that f~ is a Ck map.

For each pUp, let us take the charts, (UpM1,ϕp) and (Uf(p)M2,ϕf(p)).

f~(UpUp)Uf(p).

ϕf(p)f~ϕp1:ϕp(UpUp)Rd2 is =ϕf(p)ϕf(p)1fϕpϕp1=f, which is Ck.

Let us see that f~|UpS1=f|UpS1.

f~|UpS1=ϕf(p)1fϕp|UpS1=ϕf(p)1ϕf(p)fϕp1|ϕp(UpS1)ϕp|UpS1, because f is chosen to satisfy f|ϕp(UpS1)=ϕf(p)fϕp1|ϕp(UpS1), so, =f|UpS1.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>