2024-06-03

604: Group as Direct Sum of Finite Number of Normal Subgroups Is 'Groups - Homomorphisms' Isomorphic to Direct Product of Subgroups

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that group as direct sum of finite number of normal subgroups is 'groups - homomorphisms' isomorphic to direct product of subgroups

Topics


About: group

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that any group as the direct sum of any finite number of normal subgroups is 'groups - homomorphisms' isomorphic to the direct product of the subgroups.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
G: { the groups }
{G1,...,Gn}: { the normal subgroups of G}
f: :GG1×...×Gn,p1...pn(p1,...,pn)
//

Statements:
G= the direct sum of {G1,...,Gn}

GG1×...×Gn by f, where denotes a 'groups - homomorphisms' isomorphism and × denotes the direct product.
//


2: Natural Language Description


For any group, G, and any normal subgroups, G1,...,Gn, of G, such that G is the direct sum of {G1,...,Gn}, G is 'groups - homomorphisms' isomorphic to the direct product, G1×...×Gn.


3: Note


G is of course not the same with G1×...×Gn, because an element of G is p1...pn, while any element of G1×...×Gn has the form of (p1,...,pn).

G does not need to be Abelian, because the proposition that for any group as the direct sum of any finite number of normal subgroups, each element is uniquely decomposed and the decomposition is commutative does not require so.

But when G is Abelian, the direct product is also called 'direct sum of modules': any Abelian group is a module.


4: Proof


Each element of G can be uniquely decomposed as p1...pn for a pjGj, by the proposition that for any group as the direct sum of any finite number of normal subgroups, each element is uniquely decomposed and the decomposition is commutative. So, f is well-defined.

f is bijective, because for each p1...pnp1...pnG, pjpj for a j, which implies that (p1,...,pn)(p1,...,pn); for each (p1,...,pn)G1×...×Gn, there is p1...pn, which is mapped to (p1,...,pn).

Let us prove that f is a group homomorphism. f(1...1)=(1,...,1), which is the identity element of G1×...×Gn. These transformations profusely use the commutativity by the proposition that for any group as the direct sum of any finite number of normal subgroups, each element is uniquely decomposed and the decomposition is commutative without further mentioning it: move p1 by f(p1...pnp1...pn)=f(p1(p2...pnp1)p2...pn)=f(p1(p1p2...pn)p2...pn); then, move p2 likewise as =f(p1p1p2p2p3...pnp3...pn); and so on, after all, =f(p1p1...pnpn). So, =(p1p1,...,pnpn)=(p1,...,pn)(p1,...,pn)=f(p1...pn)f(p1...pn). f((p1...pn)1)=f(pn1...p11)=f(p11...pn1) (by the proposition that for any group as the direct sum of any finite number of normal subgroups, each element is uniquely decomposed and the decomposition is commutative) =(p11,...,pn1)=f(p1...pn)1. So, f is a group homomorphism.

f is a 'groups - homomorphisms' isomorphism, by the proposition that any bijective group homomorphism is a 'groups - homomorphisms' isomorphism.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>