2024-05-19

584: For Simplicial Complex on Finite-Dimensional Real Vectors Space, Open Subset of Underlying Space That Intersects Star Intersects Simplex Interior of Maximal Simplex Involved in Star

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that for simplicial complex on finite-dimensional real vectors space, open subset of underlying space that intersects star intersects simplex interior of maximal simplex involved in star

Topics


About: vectors space
About: topological space

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any simplicial complex on any finite-dimensional real vectors space, any open subset of the underlying space that intersects any star intersects the simplex interior of a maximal simplex involved in the star.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
V: { the d -dimensional real vectors spaces }, with the canonical topology
C: { the simplicial complexes on V}
|C|: = the underlying space of C
U: |C|, { the open subsets of |C|}
st(p): = the star of p, where pVertC
//

Statements:
Ust(p)

Sk{ the maximal simplexes in C}(pVertSkSkU)
//


2: Natural Language Description


For any d-dimensional real vectors space, V, any simplicial complex, C, on V, the underlying space, |C|, any open subset, U|C|, and the star of any vertex, pVertC, st(p), if Ust(0), there is a maximal simplex, SkC, such that pVertSk and SkU.


3: Proof


st(p) involves all the maximal simplexes that have p as a vertex (there are some positive number of such maximal simplexes), and any other simplex involved in st(p) is a proper face of at least 1 of the maximal simplexes, by the proposition that for any simplicial complex on any finite-dimensional real vectors space, each simplex in the complex is the faces of the elements of a subset of the maximal simplexes set.

For any pUst(p), p is on the simplex interior of a simplex, SlC, involved in st(p). Sl is a (not necessarily proper) face of a maximal simplex, SkC, involved in st(p).

So, pSk=[p0=p,p1...,pn], and p=j{0,...,n}tjpj.

If Sl is Sk itself, pSkU.

Let us suppose that Sl is a proper face of Sk hereafter.

p's being on a proper face of Sk means that some of tj s are 0 but 0<t0, because the face is [p,p1...,pm] where {p,p1,...,pm}{p,p1,...,pn} (the missing vertexes correspond to the 0 tj s), and if t0=0, p would not be on the simplex interior of [p,p1...,pm]. That means that j{1,...,m}tj<1, because j{0,...,m}tj=1.

Let us take a basis of V as {p1p,...,pnp,bn+1,...,bd} and the canonical chart, (V,ϕ), ϕ:s1(p1p)+...+sn(pnp)+sn+1bn+1+...+sdbd(s1,...,sd).

As p=t0p+j{1,...,n}tjpj=j{1,...,n}tj(pjp)+t0p+j{1,...,n}tjp=j{1,...,n}tj(pjp)+j{0,...,n}tjp=j{1,...,n}tj(pjp)+p, ϕ(p)=(t1+p1,...,tn+pn,pn+1,...,pd), where ϕ(p)=(p1,...,pd).

As U is open on |C|, there is an open ball, Bp,ϵ|C|, around p such that Bp,ϵU. For any point, pBp,ϵ, ϕ(p)=(t1+δ1+p1,...,tn+δn+pn,pn+1+δn+1,...,pd+δd).

While some of tj s are 0, the corresponding δj s can be taken to be small enough positive and the other δj s can be taken to be 0 such that t1+δ1+...+tn+δn<1 and j{1,...,d}δj2<ϵ. Then, p=j{1,...,n}(tj+δj+pj)(pjp)+j{n+1,...,d}pjbj=j{1,...,n}(tj+δj)(pjp)+j{1,...,n}pj(pjp)+j{n+1,...,d}pjbj=j{1,...,n}(tj+δj)(pjp)+p=j{1,...,n}(tj+δj)(pjp)+j{0,...,n}(tj+δj)p, where δ0 is defined such that j{0,...,n}(tj+δj)=1, =(t0+δ0)p+j{1,...,n}(tj+δj)pj. j{0,...,n}(tj+δj)=1 and 0<tj+δj. That means that pSk.

So, (Bp,ϵSk)(USk).


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>