2024-03-10

503: Tangent Vectors Space at Point on C Manifold with Boundary

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

definition of tangent vectors space at point on C manifold with boundary

Topics


About: C manifold

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a definition of tangent vectors space at point on C manifold with boundary.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
M: { the C manifolds with (possibly empty) boundary }
m: M
TmM: ={ the tangent vectors at m}, { the R vectors spaces } with the operations specified below
//

Conditions:
rR,vTmM,fCm(M)((rv)f=r(vf))

v1,v2TmM,fCm(M)((v1+v2)f=v1f+v2f)
//


2: Note


Let us see that TmM is indeed an R vectors space.

1st, let us see that the operations are well-defined.

Is rv really a derivation?

For each rR, (rv)(rf)=r(v(rf))=r(rv(f))=(rr)v(f)=(rr)v(f)=r(rv(f))=r((rv)(f)), so, rv is an R-linear map.

(rv)(ff)=r(v(ff))=r(v(f)f+fv(f))=rv(f)f+rfv(f)=(rv)(f)f+f(rv)(f), so, rv satisfies the Leibniz rule.

So, rv is a derivation.

Is v1+v2 really a derivation?

For each rR, (v1+v2)(rf)=v1(rf)+v2(rf)=rv1(f)+rv2(f)=r(v1(f)+v2(f))=r(v1+v2)(f), so, v1+v2 is an R-linear map.

(v1+v2)(ff)=v1(ff)+v2(ff)=v1(f)f+fv1(f)+v2(f)f+fv2(f)=(v1(f)+v2(f))f+f(v1(f)+v2(f))=(v1+v2)(f)f+f(v1+v2)(f), so, v1+v2 satisfies the Leibniz rule.

So, v1+v2 is a derivation.

1) for any elements, v1,v2TmM, v1+v2TmM (closed-ness under addition): which has been seen above.

2) for any elements, v1,v2TmM, v1+v2=v2+v1 (commutativity of addition): (v1+v2)(f)=v1(f)+v2(f)=v2(f)+v1(f)=(v2+v1)(f).

3) for any elements, v1,v2,v3TmM, (v1+v2)+v3=v1+(v2+v3) (associativity of additions): ((v1+v2)+v3)(f)=(v1+v2)(f)+v3(f)=v1(f)+v2(f)+v3(f)=v1(f)+(v2(f)+v3(f))=v1(f)+(v2+v3)(f)=(v1+(v2+v3))(f).

4) there is a 0 element, 0V, such that for any vTmM, v+0=v (existence of 0 vector): the map that maps each f to 0, 0, is obviously a derivation, so, 0TmM, and (v+0)(f)=v(f)+0(f)=v(f)+0=v(f).

5) for any element, vTmM, there is an inverse element, vTmM, such that v+v=0 (existence of inverse vector): the map that maps each f to v(f), v, is obviously a derivation, so, vTmM, and (v+v)(f)=(v+v)(f)=v(f)+v(f)=0=0(f).

6) for any element, vTmM, and any scalar, rR, r.vTmM (closed-ness under scalar multiplication): which has been seen above.

7) for any element, vTmM, and any scalars, r1,r2R, (r1+r2).v=r1.v+r2.v (scalar multiplication distributability for scalars addition): ((r1+r2).v)(f)=(r1+r2)v(f)=r1v(f)+r2v(f)=(r1v)(f)+(r2v)(f)=(r1.v+r2.v)(f).

8) for any elements, v1,v2TmM, and any scalar, rR, r.(v1+v2)=r.v1+r.v2 (scalar multiplication distributability for vectors addition): (r.(v1+v2))(f)=r(v1+v2)(f)=r(v1(f)+v2(f))=rv1(f)+rv2(f)=(rv1)(f)+(rv2)(f)=(r.v1+r.v2)(f).

9) for any element, vTmM, and any scalars, r1,r2R, (r1r2).v=r1.(r2.v) (associativity of scalar multiplications): ((r1r2).v)(f)=(r1r2)v(f)=r1(r2v(f))=r1((r2v)(f))=(r1.(r2.v))(f).

10) for any element, vTmM, 1.v=v (identity of 1 multiplication): (1.v)(f)=1v(f)=v(f).

So, TmM is an R vectors space.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>