2024-03-10

504: Subset Minus Union of Sequence of Subsets Is Intersection of Subsets Each of Which Is 1st Subset Minus Partial Union of Sequence

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

A description/proof of that subset minus union of sequence of subsets is intersection of subsets each of which is 1st subset minus partial union of sequence

Topics


About: set

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any set, any subset (the 1st subset) minus the union of any sequence of subsets is the intersection of the subsets each of which is the 1st subset minus a partial union of the sequence.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Description


For any set, S, any subset, S1S, and any sequence of subsets, S2,1,S2,2,... where S2,iS but not necessarily S2,iS1, S1iS2,i=j(S1i=1jS2,i).


2: Proof


For any pS1iS2,i, pS1 and pS2,i for each i, pS1i=1jS2,i for each j, so, pj(S1i=1jS2,i).

For any pj(S1i=1jS2,i), pS1i=1jS2,i for each j, pS1 and pS2,i for each i, so, pS1iS2,i.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>