378: Characteristic Property of Disjoint Union
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>
A description/proof of characteristic property of disjoint union
Topics
About:
topological space
The table of contents of this article
Starting Context
Target Context
-
The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any disjoint union topological space, any map from the disjoint union topological space to any topological space is continuous if and only if the composition of the map after the inclusion from each constituent space to the disjoint union topological space is continuous, and the disjoint union topology is the unique topology that makes the disjoint union topological space have that property.
Orientation
There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.
There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.
Main Body
1: Description
For any disjoint union topological space, where is any possibly uncountable indices set, any map to any topological space, , is continuous if and only if , where is the inclusion map, is continuous. And the disjoint union topology is the unique topology that makes the disjoint union topological space have that property.
2: Proof
Let us suppose that is continuous. For any open set, , is open. So, is open, by the definition of disjoint union topology. So, is continuous.
Let us suppose that is continuous. For any open set, , is open. is open, by the definition of disjoint union topology. , open. So, is continuous.
Let us suppose that has the set of but has a not-necessarily disjoint union topology while it satisfies the property. Let us take to be and to be the identity map. Then, is continuous and is continuous. For any open set, , is open on . So, has the disjoint union topology or a smaller topology. Let us take to be (with the disjoint union topology) and to be the identity map. For any open set, , is open on . So, is continuous and is continuous. For any open set, , is open on . So, has no smaller topology after all.
References
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>