2023-01-29

405: If Union of Disjoint Subsets Is Open, Each Subset Is Not Necessarily Open

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

A description/proof of that if union of disjoint subsets is open, each subset is not necessarily open

Topics


About: topological space

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that if the union of some disjoint subsets is open, each subset is not necessarily open.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Description


For any topological space, \(T\), and some disjoint subsets, \(\{S_i| S_i \subseteq T\}\), such that the union, \(S := \cup_i S_i\), is open, each \(S_i\) is not necessarily open.


2: Proof


A counterexample will suffice. Think of the \(\mathbb{R}\) Euclidean topological space, and 2 subsets, \((-1, 0), [0, 1)\), which are disjoint and the union is \((-1, 1)\), open.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>