2023-01-29

185: If Union of Disjoint Subsets Is Closed, Each Subset Is Not Necessarily Closed

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

A description/proof of that if union of disjoint subsets is closed, each subset is not necessarily closed

Topics


About: topological space

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that if the union of some disjoint subsets is closed, each subset is not necessarily closed.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Description


For any topological space, \(T\), and some disjoint subsets, \(\{S_i| S_i \subseteq T\}\), such that the union, \(S := \cup_i S_i\), is closed, each \(S_i\) is not necessarily closed.


2: Proof


A counterexample will suffice. Think of the \(\mathbb{R}\) Euclidean topological space, and 2 subsets, \([-1, 0], (0, 1]\), which are disjoint and the union is \([-1, 1]\), closed.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>