2026-09-21

1996: Module Has Unique \(0\) Element

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that module has unique \(0\) element

Topics


About: module

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that any module has the unique \(0\) element.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
\(R\): \(\in \{\text{ the rings }\}\)
\(M\): \(\in \{\text{ the } R \text{ modules }\}\)
//

Statements:
\(\forall m \in \{\text{ the zero elements of } M\} (m = 0)\)
//


2: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: see that \(m = 0\).

Step 1:

The definition of module requires the existence of a \(0 \in M\), but does not directly require that it is the unique zero element.

Let \(m \in M\) be any zero element.

\(m + 0 = m\), because \(0\) is a zero element, but \(m + 0 = 0\), because \(m\) is a zero element.

So, \(m = 0\).


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>