2026-05-24

1794: Half or Both Open Interval Is Union of Sequence of Closed Intervals

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that half or both open interval is union of sequence of closed intervals

Topics


About: set

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that any half or both open interval is the union of the sequence of some closed intervals.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
\(I\): \(\in \{\text{ the half or both open intervals }\}\), \(= (- \infty, r_2), [r_1, r_2), (r_1, \infty), (r_1, r_2], (- \infty, \infty), \text{ or } (r_1, r_2)\)
//

Statements:
\((- \infty, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}), r_2 - 2^{- n}] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (- \infty, r_2 - 2^{- n}]\)
\(\land\)
\([r_1, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1, Max (\{r_1, r_2 - 2^{- n}\})]\)
\(\land\)
\((r_1, \infty) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, \infty)\)
\(\land\)
\((r_1, r_2] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, r_2\}), r_2]\)
\(\land\)
\((- \infty, \infty) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [- n, n]\)
\(\land\)
\((r_1, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (r_1, Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), r_2)\)
//


2: Note


While \(\cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (r_1, Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})]\) or \(\cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), r_2)\) is not really "union of the sequence of some closed intervals", they are included here, because they are sometimes used.


3: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: see that \((- \infty, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}), r_2 - 2^{- n}] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (- \infty, r_2 - 2^{- n}]\); Step 2: see that \([r_1, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1, Max (\{r_1, r_2 - 2^{- n}\})]\); Step 3; see that \((r_1, \infty) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, \infty)\); Step 4: see that \((r_1, r_2] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, r_2\}), r_2]\); Step 5: \((- \infty, \infty) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [- n, n]\); Step 6: \((r_1, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (r_1, Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), r_2)\).

Step 1:

\([Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}), r_2 - 2^{- n}]\) is valid for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), because \(Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}) \le r_2 - 2^{- n}\).

Let us see that \((- \infty, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}), r_2 - 2^{- n}] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (- \infty, r_2 - 2^{- n}]\).

Let \(r \in (- \infty, r_2)\) be any.

There is an \(N_1 \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(N_1 \lt n\), \(Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}) \le - n \le r\).

\(r \lt r_2\), and there is an \(N_2 \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(N_2 \lt n\), \(r \le r_2 - 2^{- n}\).

So, for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(N_1, N_2 \lt n\), \(Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}) \le r \le r_2 - 2^{- n}\), so, \(r \in [Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}), r_2 - 2^{- n}]\).

So, \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}), r_2 - 2^{- n}]\).

So, \((- \infty, r_2) \subseteq \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}), r_2 - 2^{- n}]\).

Let \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}), r_2 - 2^{- n}]\) be any.

\(r \in [Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}), r_2 - 2^{- n}]\) for an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\).

So, \(r \in [Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}), r_2 - 2^{- n}] \subseteq (- \infty, r_2)\).

So, \(\cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}), r_2 - 2^{- n}] \subseteq (- \infty, r_2)\).

So, \((- \infty, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{- n, r_2 - 2^{- n}\}), r_2 - 2^{- n}]\).

Let \(r \in (- \infty, r_2)\) be any.

\(- \infty \lt r\).

As \(r \lt r_2\), there is an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(r \le r_2 - 2^{- n}\).

So, \(r \in (- \infty, r_2 - 2^{- n}]\).

So, \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (- \infty, r_2 - 2^{- n}]\).

So, \((- \infty, r_2) \subseteq \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (- \infty, r_2 - 2^{- n}]\).

Let \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (- \infty, r_2 - 2^{- n}]\) be any.

\(r \in (- \infty, r_2 - 2^{- n}]\) for an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\).

\(r \in (- \infty, r_2 - 2^{- n}] \subseteq (- \infty, r_2)\).

So, \(\cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (- \infty, r_2 - 2^{- n}] \subseteq (- \infty, r_2)\).

So, \((- \infty, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (- \infty, r_2 - 2^{- n}]\).

Step 2:

\([r_1, Max (\{r_1, r_2 - 2^{- n}\})]\) is valid for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), because \(r_1 \le Max (\{r_1, r_2 - 2^{- n}\})\).

Let us see that \([r_1, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1, Max (\{r_1, r_2 - 2^{- n}\})]\).

Let \(r \in [r_1, r_2)\) be any.

\(r_1 \le r\).

\(r \lt r_2\), and there is an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(r \le r_2 - 2^{- n}\), then, \(r \le r_2 - 2^{- n} \le Max (\{r_1, r_2 - 2^{- n}\})\).

So, \(r \in [r_1, Max (\{r_1, r_2 - 2^{- n}\})]\).

So, \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1, Max (\{r_1, r_2 - 2^{- n}\})]\).

So, \([r_1, r_2) \subseteq \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1, Max (\{r_1, r_2 - 2^{- n}\})]\).

Let \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1, Max (\{r_1, r_2 - 2^{- n}\})]\) be any.

\(r \in [r_1, Max (\{r_1, r_2 - 2^{- n}\})]\) for an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\).

So, \(r \in [r_1, Max (\{r_1, r_2 - 2^{- n}\})] \subseteq [r_1, r_2)\), because \(r_1 \lt r_2\) and \(r_2 - 2^{- n} \lt r_2\).

So, \(\cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1, Max (\{r_1, r_2 - 2^{- n}\})] \subseteq [r_1, r_2)\).

So, \([r_1, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1, Max (\{r_1, r_2 - 2^{- n}\})]\).

Step 3:

\([r_1 + 2^{- n}, Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})]\) is valid for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), because \(r_1 + 2^{- n} \le Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})\).

Let us see that \((r_1, \infty) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, \infty)\).

Let \(r \in (r_1, \infty)\) be any.

\(r_1 \lt r\), and there is an \(N_1 \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(N_1 \lt n\), \(r_1 + 2^{- n} \le r\).

There is an \(N_2 \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(N_2 \lt n\), \(r \le n \le Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})\).

So, for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(N_1, N_2 \lt n\), \(r_1 + 2^{- n} \le r \le Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})\), so, \(r \in [r_1 + 2^{- n}, Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})]\).

So, \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})]\).

So, \((r_1, \infty) \subseteq \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})]\).

Let \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})]\) be any.

\(r \in [r_1 + 2^{- n}, Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})]\) for an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\).

So, \(r \in [r_1 + 2^{- n}, Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})] \subseteq (r_1, \infty)\).

So, \(\cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})] \subseteq (r_1, \infty)\).

So, \((r_1, \infty) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, Max (\{n, r_1 + 2^{- n}\})]\).

Let \(r \in (r_1, \infty)\) be any.

\(r \lt \infty\).

As \(r_1 \lt r\), there is an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(r_1 + 2^{- n} \le r\).

So, \(r \in [r_1 + 2^{- n}, \infty)\).

So, \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, \infty)\).

So, \((r_1, \infty) \subseteq \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, \infty)\).

Let \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, \infty)\) be any.

\(r \in [r_1 + 2^{- n}, \infty)\) for an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\).

\(r \in [r_1 + 2^{- n}, \infty) \subseteq (r_1, \infty)\).

So, \(\cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, \infty) \subseteq (r_1, \infty)\).

So, \((r_1, \infty) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [r_1 + 2^{- n}, \infty)\).

Step 4:

Let us see that \((r_1, r_2] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, r_2\}), r_2]\).

Let \(r \in (r_1, r_2]\) be any.

\(r_1 \lt r\), and there is an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(r_1 + 2^{- n} \le r\), then, \(Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, r_2\}) \le r_1 + 2^{- n} \le r\).

\(r \le r_2\).

So, \(r \in [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, r_2\}), r_2]\).

So, \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, r_2\}), r_2]\).

So, \((r_1, r_2] \subseteq \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, r_2\}), r_2]\).

Let \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, r_2\}), r_2]\) be any.

\(r \in [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, r_2\}), r_2]\) for an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\).

So, \(r \in [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, r_2\}), r_2] \subseteq (r_1, r_2]\), because \(r_1 \lt r_1 + 2^{- n}\) and \(r_1 \lt r_2\).

So, \(\cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, r_2\}), r_2] \subseteq (r_1, r_2]\).

So, \((r_1, r_2] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, r_2\}), r_2]\).

Step 5:

Let us see that \((- \infty, \infty) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [- n, n]\).

Let \(r \in (- \infty, \infty)\) be any.

There is an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(r \in [- n, n]\).

So, \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [- n, n]\).

So, \((- \infty, \infty) \subseteq \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [- n, n]\).

Let \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [- n, n]\) be any.

\(r \in [- n, n]\) for an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\).

So, \(r \in [- n, n] \subseteq (- \infty, \infty)\).

So, \(\cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [- n, n] \subseteq (- \infty, \infty)\).

So, \((- \infty, \infty) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [- n, n]\).

Step 6:

\([Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})]\) is valid for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), because \(Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}) \le (r_1 + r_2) / 2 \le Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})\).

\((r_1, Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2]\) is valid for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), because \(r_1 \lt (r_1 + r_2) / 2 \le Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2)\).

\(\cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), r_2)\) is valid for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), because \(Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}) \le (r_1 + r_2) / 2 \lt r_2\).

Let us see that \((r_1, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (r_1, Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})] = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), r_2)\).

Let \(r \in (r_1, r_2)\) be any.

\(r_1 \lt r\), and there is an \(N_1 \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(N_1 \lt n\), \(r_1 + 2^{- n} \le r\), then, \(Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}) \le r_1 + 2^{- n} \le r\).

\(r \lt r_2\), and there is an \(N_2 \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(N_2 \lt n\), \(r \le r_2 - 2^{- n}\), then, \(r \le r_2 - 2^{- n} \le Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})\).

For each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(N_1, N_2 \lt n\), \(Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}) \le r \le Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})\), so, \(r \in [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})]\).

So, \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})]\).

So, \((r_1, r_2) \subseteq \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})]\).

Let \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})]\) be any.

\(r \in [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})]\) for an \(N \in \mathbb{N}\).

\(r \in [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})] \subseteq (r_1, r_2)\), because \(r_1 \lt r_1 + 2^{- n}\) and \(r_1 \lt (r_1 + r_2) / 2\) and \(r_2 - 2^{- n} \lt r_2\) and \((r_1 + r_2) / 2 \lt r_2\).

So, \(\cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})] \subseteq (r_1, r_2)\).

So, \((r_1, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})]\).

Let \(r \in (r_1, r_2)\) be any.

\(r_1 \lt r\).

\(r \lt r_2\), and there is an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(r \le r_2 - 2^{- n}\), then, \(r \le r_2 - 2^{- n} \le Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})\).

So, \(r \in (r_1, Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})]\).

So, \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (r_1, Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})]\).

So, \((r_1, r_2) \subseteq \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (r_1, Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})]\).

Let \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (r_1, Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})]\) be any.

\(r \in (r_1, Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})]\) for an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\).

\(r \in (r_1, Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})] \subseteq (r_1, r_2)\), because \(r_2 - 2^{- n} \lt r_2\) and \((r_1 + r_2) / 2 \lt r_2\).

So, \(\cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (r_1, Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})] \subseteq (r_1, r_2)\).

So, \((r_1, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (r_1, Max (\{r_2 - 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\})]\).

Let \(r \in (r_1, r_2)\) be any.

\(r_1 \lt r\), and there is an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}) \le r_1 + 2^{- n} \le r\).

\(r \lt r_2\).

So, \(r \in [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), r_2)\).

So, \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), r_2)\).

So, \((r_1, r_2) \subseteq \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), r_2)\).

Let \(r \in \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), r_2)\) be any.

\(r \in [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), r_2)\) for an \(n \in \mathbb{N}\).

\(r \in [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), r_2) \subseteq (r_1, r_2)\), because \(r_1 \lt r_1 + 2^{- n}\) and \(r_1 \lt (r_1 + r_2) / 2\).

So, \(\cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), r_2) \subseteq (r_1, r_2)\).

So, \((r_1, r_2) = \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} [Min (\{r_1 + 2^{- n}, (r_1 + r_2) / 2\}), r_2)\).


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>