2026-05-17

1784: For Measure Space and \(2\) Measurable Subsets, Measure of Union of Subsets Is Sum of Measures of Subsets Minus Measure of Intersection of Subsets

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that for measure space and \(2\) measurable subsets, measure of union of subsets is sum of measures of subsets minus measure of intersection of subsets

Topics


About: measure space

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any measure space and any \(2\) measurable subsets, the measure of the union of the subsets is the sum of the measures of the subsets minus the measure of the intersection of the subsets.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
\((M, A, \mu)\): \(\in \{\text{ the measure spaces }\}\)
\(\{a_1, a_2\}\): \(\subseteq A\)
//

Statements:
\(\mu (a_1 \cup a_2) = \mu (a_1) + \mu (a_2) - \mu (a_1 \cap a_2)\)
//


2: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: see that \(a_1 \cup a_2 = (a_1 \setminus (a_1 \cap a_2)) \cup (a_2 \setminus (a_1 \cap a_2)) \cup (a_1 \cap a_2)\), as the exclusive union; Step 2: see that \(\mu (a_1 \cup a_2) = \mu (a_1) + \mu (a_2) - \mu (a_1 \cap a_2)\), by using the exclusive union.

Step 1:

\(a_1 \cup a_2 = (a_1 \setminus (a_1 \cap a_2)) \cup (a_2 \setminus (a_1 \cap a_2)) \cup (a_1 \cap a_2)\), as the exclusive union, by the proposition that for any \(2\) sets, the union of the sets is the exclusive union of the 1st set minus the intersection of the sets, the 2nd set minus the intersection of the sets, and the intersection of the sets.

Step 2:

So, \(\mu (a_1 \cup a_2) = \mu ((a_1 \setminus (a_1 \cap a_2)) \cup (a_2 \setminus (a_1 \cap a_2)) \cup (a_1 \cap a_2)) = \mu (a_1 \setminus (a_1 \cap a_2)) + \mu (a_2 \setminus (a_1 \cap a_2)) + \mu (a_1 \cap a_2)\).

But \(\mu (a_1 \setminus (a_1 \cap a_2)) = \mu (a_1) - \mu (a_1 \cap a_2)\), because \(a_1 = (a_1 \setminus (a_1 \cap a_2)) \cup (a_1 \cap a_2)\), as the exclusive union; \(\mu (a_2 \setminus (a_1 \cap a_2)) = \mu (a_2) - \mu (a_1 \cap a_2)\), likewise.

So, \(= \mu (a_1) - \mu (a_1 \cap a_2) + \mu (a_2) - \mu (a_1 \cap a_2) + \mu (a_1 \cap a_2) = \mu (a_1) + \mu (a_2) - \mu (a_1 \cap a_2)\).


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>