2025-06-01

1148: For Commutative Ring, Inverse of Transpose of Matrix Is Transpose of Inverse of Matrix

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that for commutative ring, inverse of transpose of matrix is transpose of inverse of matrix

Topics


About: matrices space

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any commutative ring, the inverse of the transpose of any invertible matrix is the transpose of the inverse of the matrix.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
R: { the commutative rings }
M: { the m×m invertible R matrices }
//

Statements:
Mt1=M1t
//


2: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: see that M1tMt=I and see that MtM1t=I.

Step 1:

M1tMt=(MM1)t, by the proposition that for any commutative ring, the transpose of the product of any matrices is the product of the transposes of the constituents in the reverse order, =It=I.

MtM1t=(M1M)t, by the proposition that for any commutative ring, the transpose of the product of any matrices is the product of the transposes of the constituents in the reverse order, =It=I.

That means that Mt1=M1t.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>