2025-03-30

1060: For Continuous Map and Net with Directed Index Set That Converges to Point on Domain, Image of Net Converges to Image of Point and if Codomain Is Hausdorff, Convergence of Image of Net Is Image of Point

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that for continuous map and net with directed index set that converges to point on domain, image of net converges to image of point and if codomain is Hausdorff, convergence of image of net is image of point

Topics


About: topological space

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any continuous map and any net with directed index set that converges to any point on the domain, the image of the net converges to the image of the point and if the codomain is Hausdorff, the convergence of the image of the net is the image of the point.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
T1: { the topological spaces }
T2: { the topological spaces }
f: :T1T2, { the continuous maps }
D: { the directed index sets }
N: :DT1, { the nets with D}
t: T1, { the convergences of N}
f(t): T2
//

Statements:
f(t){ the convergences of fN}

(
T2{ the Hausdorff topological spaces }

limfN=f(t)
)
//


2: Note


"the convergence of net" makes sense only when there is the unique convergence of the net.

So, 'the net converges to a point' is different from 'the convergence of the net is the point': the latter means that there is the unique convergence of the net.

The 1st-half of this proposition says that fN converges to f(t); the 2nd-half of this proposition says that fN has the unique convergence and the convergence is f(t).


3: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: see that fN is a net with D; Step 2: take any neighborhood of f(t), Nf(t); Step 3: take an open neighborhood of t, Ut, such that f(Ut)Nf(t); Step 4: take a j0D such that for each jD such that j0j, N(j)Ut; Step 5: see that fN(j)Nf(t); Step 6: suppose that T2 is Hausdorff, and see that the convergence of fN is unique and is f(t).

Step 1:

fN is :DT1T2, and so, is a net with D.

Step 2:

Let us take any neighborhood of f(t), Nf(t)T2.

Step 3:

As f is continuous, there is an open neighborhood of t, UtT1, such that f(Ut)Nf(t).

Step 4:

As N converges to t, there is a j0D such that for each jD such that j0j, N(j)Ut.

Step 5:

For each jD such that j0j, fN(j)f(Ut)Nf(t), which means that fN converges to f(t).

But that does not necessarily mean that f(t) is the unique convergence. So, it is not warranted to talk about "the convergence of fN".

Step 6:

Let us suppose that T2 is Hausdorff.

By the proposition that for any Hausdorff topological space, any net with directed index set can have only 1 convergence at most, there is at most 1 convergence, but there is indeed a convergence, f(t), and so, f(t) is the unique convergence of fN.

So, it is warranted to denote limfN=f(t).


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>