2025-03-09

1033: Canonical 'Vectors Spaces - Linear Morphisms' Isomorphism Between Finite-Dimensional Vectors Space and Its Double Dual Space

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

definition of canonical 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphism between finite-dimensional vectors space and its double dual space

Topics


About: vectors space

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a definition of canonical 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphism between finite-dimensional vectors space and its double dual space.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
F: { the fields }
V: { the finite-dimensional F vectors spaces }
V: =L(V:F)
V: =L(L(V:F):F)
J: { the finite index sets }
B: { the bases for V}, ={bj|jJ}
B: = the dual basis of B, ={bj|jJ}
B: = the dual basis of B, ={b~j|jJ}
f: :VV,vjbjjJvjb~j, { the 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphisms }
//

Conditions:
//

f does not depend on the choice of B: compare to the definition of canonical 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphism between finite-dimensional vectors space and its covectors space with respect to original space basis with "with respect to original space basis".


2: Note


f is indeed a 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphism, does not depend on the choice of B, and has the property that for each vV and each wV, w(v)=f(v)(w), by the proposition that between any finite-dimensional vectors space and its double dual, there is the canonical 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphism.

Although it is sometimes sloppily expressed like "The double dual of a finite-dimensional vectors space is the original vectors space.", the double dual is not the same entity with the original vectors space, as the 2 have different meanings. They are just 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphic, and having such a relation does not make 2 entities the same.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>