2025-01-26

970: For Field, if Field Has Non-1 Prime-Number-th Root of 1, Root Is Primitive Root

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that for field, if field has non-1 prime-number-th root of 1, root is primitive root

Topics


About: field

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any field, if the field has a non-1 prime-number-th root of 1, the root is a primitive the-number-th root of 1.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
F: { the fields }
p: { the prime numbers }
//

Statements:
αF{1}(αp=1)

j{1,...,p1}(αj1)
//


2: Note


There may not be such any α. For example, when F=R and p=3, x3=1 has only 1 root, 1, which is not non-1. Of course, if we take F=C, there is α=e2πi/3 or e2πi2/3F.

p is a prime number in N, not any prime in F: taking an an-element-of-F-th power of α does not make sense; the power is about taking the a-natural-number-times self-product of α, so, the power needs to be a natural number.

p needs to be a prime number for this proposition: if F=Q and p=4, there is α=1, which satisfies α1 and αp=1, but α2=1.


3: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: take the smallest positive natural number, n, such that αn=1; Step 2: suppose that n<p, and find a contradiction.

Step 1:

Let us take the smallest positive natural number, n, such that αn=1. That obviously exists as 1<np.

Step 2:

Let us suppose that n<p.

αp=αn.

α0, because if α=0, αq=01: the proposition that for any field, any positive-natural-number-th root of 0 is 0, a contradiction.

So, α would have an inverse, α1, and αpn=αpαn=αnαn=1. But n was supposed to be the smallest such, and npn, but npn, because otherwise, n=pn would mean that p=2n, a contradiction against p's being a prime number, so, n<pn. But as αpn=αn, αp2n=1, and n<p2n: np2n lest p=3n. Likewise, n<pjn for any positive natural number, j. That would be impossible, because pjn would get smaller and smaller while n is fixed.

So, n=p.

That means that j{1,...,p1}(αj1), which is what is meant by "α is a primitive p-th root of 1".


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>