2024-12-22

906: Subset Minus Union of Subsets Is Intersection of 1st Subset Minus 2nd Chunk of Subsets

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that subset minus union of subsets is intersection of 1st subset minus 2nd chunk of subsets

Topics


About: set

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any set, any subset minus the union of any subsets is the intersection of the 1st subset minus the 2nd chunk of subsets.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
S: { the sets }
S1: S
{S2,jS|jJ}: J{ the possibly uncountable index sets }
//

Statements:
S1jJS2,j=jJ(S1S2,j)
//


2: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: see that S1jJS2,jjJ(S1S2,j); Step 2: see that jJ(S1S2,j)S1jJS2,j.

Step 1:

Let pS1jJS2,j be any.

pS1. pjJS2,j, so, pS2,j for each jJ. So, pS1S2,j for each j. So, pjJ(S1S2,j).

Step 2:

Let pjJ(S1S2,j) be any.

pS1S2,j for each jJ, so, pS1 and pS2,j for each j, so, pjJS2,j, so, pS1jJS2,j.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>