2024-12-08

894: For Map, Image of Subset Minus Subset Contains Image of 1st Subset Minus Image of 2nd Subset

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that for map, image of subset minus subset contains image of 1st subset minus image of 2nd subset

Topics


About: set

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any map, the image of any subset minus any subset contains the image of the 1st subset minus the image of the 2nd subset.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
S1: { the sets }
S2: { the sets }
f: S1S2
S1,1: S1
S1,2: S1
//

Statements:
f(S1,1)f(S1,2)f(S1,1S1,2)
//


2: Natural Language Description


For any sets, S1,S2, any map, f:S1S2, and any subsets, S1,1,S1,2S1, f(S1,1)f(S1,2)f(S1,1S1,2).


3: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: for each pf(S1,1)f(S1,2), take a pS1,1S1,2 such that p=f(p), and conclude the proposition.

Step 1:

For each pf(S1,1)f(S1,2), there is a pS1,1S1,2 such that p=f(p), because while p is realized as p=f(p) for a pS1,1, if pS1,2, f(p)f(S1,2), which could not be p because pf(S1,2), so, p is realized by a pS1,1S1,2.

So, p=f(p)f(S1,1S1,2).


4: Note


The equality holds when f is injective, by the proposition that for any injective map, the image of any subset minus any subset is the image of the 1st subset minus the image of the 2nd subset.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>