2024-12-08

885: For 2 Square Matrices over Commutative Ring, Trace of Product of Matrices Does Not Depend on Order of Product

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that for 2 square matrices over commutative ring, trace of product of matrices does not depend on order of product

Topics


About: ring

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any 2 same-dimensional square matrices over any commutative ring, the trace of each product of the matrices does not depend on the order of the product.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
R: { the commutative rings }
A: { the n × n matrices over R}, =(akj)
B: { the n × n matrices over R}, =(bkj)
//

Statements:
tr(AB)=tr(BA)
//


2: Note


Typically, R is a field, and more typically, R is R or C, but this proposition requires only that R is any commutative ring.

As an immediate corollary, for any more than 2 same-dimensional square matrices, the order of any product can be cyclically changed with the trace intact: tr(A1...Ak)=tr(A1(A2...Ak))=tr((A2...Ak)A1)=tr(A2...AkA1), e.t.c..


3: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: express tr(AB) and tr(BA) with the components of A and B and see that they are the same.

Step 1:

AB=(l{1,...,n}aljbkl).

tr(AB)=j{1,...,n}l{1,...,n}aljbjl.

BA=(l{1,...,n}bljakl).

tr(BA)=j{1,...,n}l{1,...,n}bljajl=j{1,...,n}l{1,...,n}ajlblj=l{1,...,n}j{1,...,n}ajlblj=j{1,...,n}l{1,...,n}aljbjl, where the last equal is because the name of any dummy index can be arbitrarily changed, =tr(AB).


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>