2024-11-10

860: Identity Map from Subset of Euclidean C Manifold or Closed Upper Half Euclidean C Manifold with Boundary into Subset of Euclidean C Manifold or Closed Upper Half Euclidean C Manifold with Boundary Is C

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that identity map from subset of Euclidean C manifold or closed upper half Euclidean C manifold with Boundary into subset of Euclidean C manifold or closed upper half Euclidean C manifold with boundary is C

Topics


About: C manifold

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that the identity map from any subset of any Euclidean C manifold or any closed upper half Euclidean C manifold with Boundary into any subset of the same-dimensional Euclidean C manifold or the same-dimensional closed upper half Euclidean C manifold with boundary is C.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
Rd: = the Euclidean C manifold 
Hd: = the closed upper half Euclidean C manifold with boundary 
S1: Rd or Hd
S2: Rd or Hd
f: :S1S2,ss
//

Statements:
f{ the C maps }
//

S1 and S2 are such that f is possible.


2: Note


This proposition may seem obvious, but let us be ease at conscience by proving it once and for all, based on the definition of 'Ck map between arbitrary subsets of C manifolds with boundary, where k includes '.

The point is that a subset may be of Hd instead of of Rd and S1 or S2 may be an arbitrary subset instead of an open subset.


3: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: suppose that S1Rd and S2Rd, take the charts, (RdRd,id) and (RdRd,id), and see that idfid1|id(S1):id(S1)id(Rd) is C; Step 2: suppose that S1Rd and S2Hd, take the charts, (RdRd,id) and (HdHd,id), and see that idfid1|id(S1):id(S1)id(Hd) is C; Step 3: suppose that S1Hd and S2Rd, take the charts, (HdHd,id) and (RdRd,id), and see that idfid1|id(S1):id(S1)id(Rd) is C; Step 4: suppose that S1Hd and S2Hd, take the charts, (HdHd,id) and (HdHd,id), and see that idfid1|id(S1):id(S1)id(Hd) is C.

While all the Steps are almost the same, let us do all of them diligently.

Step 1:

Let us suppose that S1Rd and S2Rd.

Let sS1 be any.

Let us take the chart around s, (RdRd,id), and the chart around f(s), (RdRd,id).

Let us see that idfid1|id(S1):id(S1)id(Rd) is C at id(s), which is the proposition is about by the definition of Ck map between arbitrary subsets of C manifolds with boundary, where k includes .

Let us take the open neighborhood of id(s), Uid(s):=RdRd and the C extension of idfid1|id(S1), f:RdRd,rr.

f is indeed C, because it is the identity map from Rd onto Rd.

f|id(S1)=idfid1|id(S1), obviously.

So, f is C at each sS1, and so, f is C all over.

Step 2:

Let us suppose that S1Rd and S2Hd.

Let sS1 be any.

Let us take the chart around s, (RdRd,id), and the chart around f(s), (HdHd,id).

Let us see that idfid1|id(S1):id(S1)id(Hd) is C at id(s), which is the proposition is about by the definition of Ck map between arbitrary subsets of C manifolds with boundary, where k includes .

Let us take the open neighborhood of id(s), Uid(s):=RdRd and the C extension of idfid1|id(S1), f:RdRd,rr.

f is indeed C, because it is the identity map from Rd onto Rd.

f|id(S1)=idfid1|id(S1), obviously.

So, f is C at each sS1, and so, f is C all over.

Step 3:

Let us suppose that S1Hd and S2Rd.

Let sS1 be any.

Let us take the chart around s, (HdHd,id), and the chart around f(s), (RdRd,id).

Let us see that idfid1|id(S1):id(S1)id(Rd) is C at id(s), which is the proposition is about by the definition of Ck map between arbitrary subsets of C manifolds with boundary, where k includes .

Let us take the open neighborhood of id(s), Uid(s):=RdRd and the C extension of idfid1|id(S1), f:RdRd,rr.

f is indeed C, because it is the identity map from Rd onto Rd.

f|id(S1)=idfid1|id(S1), obviously.

So, f is C at each sS1, and so, f is C all over.

Step 4:

Let us suppose that S1Hd and S2Hd.

Let sS1 be any.

Let us take the chart around s, (HdHd,id), and the chart around f(s), (HdHd,id).

Let us see that idfid1|id(S1):id(S1)id(Hd) is C at id(s), which is the proposition is about by the definition of Ck map between arbitrary subsets of C manifolds with boundary, where k includes .

Let us take the open neighborhood of id(s), Uid(s):=RdRd and the C extension of idfid1|id(S1), f:RdRd,rr.

f is indeed C, because it is the identity map from Rd onto Rd.

f|id(S1)=idfid1|id(S1), obviously.

So, f is C at each sS1, and so, f is C all over.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>