860: Identity Map from Subset of Euclidean Manifold or Closed Upper Half Euclidean Manifold with Boundary into Subset of Euclidean Manifold or Closed Upper Half Euclidean Manifold with Boundary Is
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>
description/proof of that identity map from subset of Euclidean manifold or closed upper half Euclidean manifold with Boundary into subset of Euclidean manifold or closed upper half Euclidean manifold with boundary is
Topics
About:
manifold
The table of contents of this article
Starting Context
Target Context
-
The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that the identity map from any subset of any Euclidean manifold or any closed upper half Euclidean manifold with Boundary into any subset of the same-dimensional Euclidean manifold or the same-dimensional closed upper half Euclidean manifold with boundary is .
Orientation
There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.
There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.
Main Body
1: Structured Description
Here is the rules of Structured Description.
Entities:
:
:
:
:
:
//
Statements:
//
and are such that is possible.
2: Note
This proposition may seem obvious, but let us be ease at conscience by proving it once and for all, based on the definition of ' map between arbitrary subsets of manifolds with boundary, where includes '.
The point is that a subset may be of instead of of and or may be an arbitrary subset instead of an open subset.
3: Proof
Whole Strategy: Step 1: suppose that and , take the charts, and , and see that is ; Step 2: suppose that and , take the charts, and , and see that is ; Step 3: suppose that and , take the charts, and , and see that is ; Step 4: suppose that and , take the charts, and , and see that is .
While all the Steps are almost the same, let us do all of them diligently.
Step 1:
Let us suppose that and .
Let be any.
Let us take the chart around , , and the chart around , .
Let us see that is at , which is the proposition is about by the definition of map between arbitrary subsets of manifolds with boundary, where includes .
Let us take the open neighborhood of , and the extension of , .
is indeed , because it is the identity map from onto .
, obviously.
So, is at each , and so, is all over.
Step 2:
Let us suppose that and .
Let be any.
Let us take the chart around , , and the chart around , .
Let us see that is at , which is the proposition is about by the definition of map between arbitrary subsets of manifolds with boundary, where includes .
Let us take the open neighborhood of , and the extension of , .
is indeed , because it is the identity map from onto .
, obviously.
So, is at each , and so, is all over.
Step 3:
Let us suppose that and .
Let be any.
Let us take the chart around , , and the chart around , .
Let us see that is at , which is the proposition is about by the definition of map between arbitrary subsets of manifolds with boundary, where includes .
Let us take the open neighborhood of , and the extension of , .
is indeed , because it is the identity map from onto .
, obviously.
So, is at each , and so, is all over.
Step 4:
Let us suppose that and .
Let be any.
Let us take the chart around , , and the chart around , .
Let us see that is at , which is the proposition is about by the definition of map between arbitrary subsets of manifolds with boundary, where includes .
Let us take the open neighborhood of , and the extension of , .
is indeed , because it is the identity map from onto .
, obviously.
So, is at each , and so, is all over.
References
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>