2024-10-20

830: For C Manifold with Boundary and Open Submanifold with Boundary, Differential of Inclusion at Point on Open Submanifold with Boundary Is 'Vectors Spaces- Linear Morphisms' Isomorphism

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that for C manifold with boundary and open submanifold with boundary, differential of inclusion at point on open submanifold with boundary is 'vectors spaces- linear morphisms' isomorphism

Topics


About: C manifold

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any C manifold with boundary and any open submanifold with boundary, the differential of the inclusion at each point on the open submanifold with boundary is a 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphism.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
M: { the d -dimensional C manifolds with boundary }
M: { the open submanifolds with boundary of M}
ι: :MM, = the inclusion 
m: M
dιm: :TmMTmM, = the differential 
//

Statements:
dιm{ the 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphisms }
//


2: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: see that dιm is injective, by seeing that dιm(v1)=dιm(v2) implies that v1=v2; Step 2: see that dιm is surjective, by seeing that for each vTmM, vTmM as that for each fC(M), vf=vf is mapped to v, where f is any "extension" of f on M; Step 3: conclude the proposition.

Step 1:

Let us see that dιm is injective.

Let v1,v2TmM be any such that v1v2.

Let us suppose that dιm(v1)=dιm(v2).

dιm(v1v2)=0.

Let fC(M) be any.

f would be C also as a function with M regarded as the subset of M (instead of as the submanifold): each chart of M is also a chart of M.

By the proposition that for any C function on any point open neighborhood of any C manifold with boundary, there exists a C function on the whole manifold with boundary that equals the original function on a possibly smaller neighborhood of the point, there would be an open neighborhood of m, UmM, such that Umι(M), and a C function, f:MR, such that f|Um=f|Um.

v1(fι)=dιm(v1)f=dιm(v2)f=v2(fι).

But fι|Um=f|Um.

So, vj(fι)=vjf, because any tangent vector is a local operator.

So, v1f=v1(fι)=v2(fι)=v2f, a contradiction.

So, dιm(v1)dιm(v2).

Step 2:

Let us see that dιm is surjective.

Let vTmM be any.

Let us define vTmM as that for each fC(M), vf=vf, where fC(M) is gotten from f as above.

Let us see that v is well-defined. An f exists as before. vf does not depend on the choice of f, because v is a local operator.

Let us see that v is indeed a derivation.

v(rf)=vrf=v(rf)=rvf=rvf. v(f1f2)=v(f1f2)=v(f1 f2)=(vf1)f2(m)+f1(m)vf2=(vf1)f2(m)+f1(m)vf2: although f1 and f2 may have some different open neighborhoods of m, the intersection of the open neighborhoods is an open neighborhood of m on which f1 f2 equals f1f2.

So, v is indeed a derivation.

Let us see that dιmv=v.

For each fC(M), dιmv(f)=v(fι)=vfι, but f is a C extension of fι, so, =vf.

So, dιmv=v.

Step 3:

dιm is a 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphism, by the proposition that any bijective linear morphism is a 'vectors spaces - linear morphisms' isomorphism.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>