2024-09-08

764: Finite-Product C Manifold with Boundary

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

definition of finite-product C manifold with boundary

Topics


About: C manifold

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a definition of finite-product C manifold with boundary.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
{M1,...,Mn1}: { the C manifolds }, with the atlases, {A1,...,An1}
Mn: { the C manifolds with boundary }, with the atlas, An
M1×...×Mn: = the C manifold with boundary  with the product topology and the atlas, A, specified later
f: :Rd1×...×RdnRd1+...+dn, = the canonical homeomorphism 
g: :Rd1×...×HdnHd1+...+dn, = the canonical homeomorphism 
//

Conditions:
(Uj,αjMj,ϕj,αj)Aj((U1,α1×...×Un,αnM1×...×Mn,(f or g)ϕ1,α1×...×ϕn,αn)A), where f or g depends on whether (Un,αnMn,ϕj,αn) is an inner chart or a boundary chart
//


2: Natural Language Description


For any C manifolds, M1,...,Mn1, with any atlases, A1,...,An1, any C manifold with boundary, Mn, with any atlas, An, the canonical homeomorphism, f:Rd1×...×RdnRd1+...+dn, and the canonical homeomorphism, g:Rd1×...×HdnHd1+...+dn, the C manifold with boundary, M1×...×Mn, with the product topology and the atlas, A, such that (Uj,αjMj,ϕj,αj)Aj((U1,α1×...×Un,αnM1×...×Mn,(f or g)ϕ1,α1×...×ϕn,αn)A), where f or g depends on whether (Un,αnMn,ϕj,αn) is an inner chart or a boundary chart


3: Note


The boundary of Mn may be empty, then, Mn will be a C manifold, and M1×...×Mn will be a C manifold. So, this definition includes 'finite-product C manifold'.

Let us see that the definition is well-defined.

The product of any Hausdorff topological spaces is a Hausdorff topological space, by the proposition that the product of any possibly uncountable number of Hausdorff topological spaces is Hausdorff.

The product of any finite number of 2nd-countable topological spaces is a 2nd-countable topological space, by the proposition that the product of any finite number of 2nd-countable topological spaces is 2nd-countable.

U1,α1×...×Un,αnM1×...×Mn is open, by the definition of product topology.

f and g are indeed homeomorphisms, by the proposition that the d-dimensional Euclidean topological space is homeomorphic to the product of any combination of some lower-dimensional Euclidean spaces whose (the product's) dimension equals d and the proposition that the d-dimensional closed upper half Euclidean topological space is homeomorphic to the product of any combination of some lower-dimensional Euclidean spaces and a closed upper half Euclidean space whose (the product's) dimension equals d.

(f or g)ϕ1,α1(U1,α1)×...×ϕn,αn(Un,αn)Rd1+...+dn or Hd1+...+dn is open, by the definition of product topology, because ϕj,αj(Uj,αj)Rdj or Hdj is open.

(f or g)ϕ1,α1×...×ϕn,αn is a homeomorphism, by the proposition that the product map of any finite number of continuous maps is continuous by the product topologies and the proposition that the preimage by any product map is the product of the preimages by the component maps: as each component map is a homeomorphism, the preimage of each point on the product codomain is the point that is the product of the images under the inverses of the component maps, so, the inverse of the product map is the product of the continuous inverses of the component maps.

As for the transition map, (f or g)ϕ1,α1×...×ϕn,αn((f or g)ϕ1,α1×...×ϕn,αn)1=(f or g)ϕ1,α1×...×ϕn,αn(ϕ1,α11×...×ϕn,αn1(f or g)1), by the proposition that the preimage by any product map is the product of the preimages by the component maps, and =(f or g)(ϕ1,α1ϕ1,α11)×...×(ϕn,αnϕn,αn1)(f or g)1, by the proposition that any composition of product maps is the product map of the compositions of the component maps, which is C because each ϕj,αjϕj,αj1 is C.

The charts cover M1×...×Mn, because for each (m1,...,mn)M1×...×Mn, there is a chart, (Uj,αjMj,ϕj,αj)Aj, such that mjUj,αj for each j{1,...,n}, and (m1,...,mn)U1,α1×...×Un,αn.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>