2024-07-29

700: For Topological Space, Sequence of Preimages of Natural-Numbers-Closed-Upper-Bounds Intervals Under Exhaustion Function Is Exhaustion of Space by Compact Subsets

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

description/proof of that for topological space, sequence of preimages of natural-numbers-closed-upper-bounds intervals under exhaustion function is exhaustion of space by compact subsets

Topics


About: topological space

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any topological space, the sequence of the preimages of the natural-numbers-closed-upper-bounds intervals under any exhaustion function is an exhaustion of the space by compact subsets.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
T: { the topological spaces }
R: = the Euclidean topological space 
f: :TR, { the exhaustion functions on T}
s: :N{0}{ the compact subsets of T},jf1((,j])
//

Statements:
s{ the exhaustions of T by compact subsets }
//


2: Natural Language Description


For any topological space, T, the Euclidean topological space, R, and any exhaustion function on T, f:TR, the sequence, s:N{0}{ the compact subsets of T},jf1((,j]), is an exhaustion of T by compact subsets.


3: Proof


Whole Strategy: Step 1: see that T=jN{0}s(j); Step 2: see that s(j)s(j+1).

Step 1:

Let us see that T=jN{0}s(j).

For each pT, f(p)n for an nN{0}. So, pf1((,n])=s(n). So, T=jN{0}s(j).

Step 2:

Let us see that s(j)s(j+1).

Step 2 Strategy: Step 2-1: see that it suffices to show that for each ps(j), there is an open neighborhood of p contained in s(j+1); Step 2-2: prove the claim.

Obviously, s(j)s(j+1).

Step 2-1:

It suffices to show that for each ps(j), there is an open neighborhood of p, UpT, such that Ups(j+1), because then, s(j)ps(j)Ups(j+1), while ps(j)Up will be an open subset contained in s(j+1), which will mean that ps(j)Ups(j+1).

Step 2-2:

Let us show Up.

f(p)(,j]. Let us take any ϵ<1 and the open ball, Bf(p),ϵ=(f(p)ϵ,f(p)+ϵ)R. Bf(p),ϵ(,j+1]. As f is continuous, there is an open neighborhood of p, UpT, such that f(Up)Bf(p),ϵ. So, f(Up)Bf(p),ϵ(,j+1]. That means that Ups(j+1).


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>