667: For Rectangle Matrix over Principal Integral Domain, There Are Some Types of Rows or Columns Operations Each of Which Can Be Expressed as Multiplication by Invertible Matrix from Left or Right
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>
description/proof of that for rectangle matrix over principal integral domain, there are some types of rows or columns operations each of which can be expressed as multiplication by invertible matrix from left or right
Topics
About:
ring
The table of contents of this article
Starting Context
Target Context
-
The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any rectangle matrix over any principal integral domain, there are some types of rows or columns operations each of which can be expressed as the multiplication by an invertible matrix from left or right.
Orientation
There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.
There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.
Main Body
1: Structured Description
Here is the rules of Structured Description.
Entities:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: ,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: ,
:
:
:
:
:
//
Statements:
multiplies the -th row by
swaps the -th row and the -th row
adds the -th row multiplied by to the -th row
replaces the -th row by the -th row multiplied by plus the -th row multiplied by and replaces the -th row by the -th row multiplied by plus the -th row multiplied by , resulting with and
multiplies the -th column by
swaps the -th column and the -th column
adds the -th column multiplied by to the -th column
replaces the -th column by the -th column multiplied by plus the -th column multiplied by and replaces the -th column by the -th column multiplied by plus the -th column multiplied by , resulting with and
//
, , , and exist, by the proposition that any principal integral domain is a greatest common divisors domain, and for each 2 elements on the principal integral domain, each of the greatest common divisors of the 2 elements is a one by which the sum of the principal ideals by the 2 elements is the principal ideal.
2: Natural Language Description
For any principal integral domain, , the set of the units, , any matrix over , , any , any , any , any , any , any such that , the identity matrix, , , , , , , , and , , multiplies the -th row by , swaps the -th row and the -th row, adds the -th row multiplied by to the -th row, replaces the -th row by the -th row multiplied by plus the -th row multiplied by and replaces the -th row by the -th row multiplied by plus the -th row multiplied by , resulting with and , , , , and .
For any , any , any , any such that , the identity matrix, , , , , , , , and , , multiplies the -th column by , swaps the -th column and the -th column, adds the -th column multiplied by to the -th column, replaces the -th column by the -th column multiplied by plus the -th column multiplied by and replaces the -th column by the -th column multiplied by plus the -th column multiplied by , resulting with and , , , , and .
3: Note
As is not supposed to be a field, multiplying a row or a column by an arbitrary element of may not be expressed as an invertible matrix. and are introduced in order to make up for that shortcoming: if was supposed to be a field, any or operation could be done with and or and operations.
This proposition does not claim that those are the only possible operations; those operations are cited for leading to a Smith normal form.
4: Proof
Hereafter, let us denote the component of any matrix, , as .
Let us see that multiplies the -th row by .
.
When , . When , .
That means that only the -th row is multiplied by .
Let us see that .
Let us define as with 1 replaced by .
. When , . When , ; when , ; when , .
So, .
. When , . When , ; when , ; when , .
So, .
Let us see that swaps the -th row and the -th row.
.
When , .
When , .
When , .
That means that the -th row and the -th row are swapped.
Let us see that .
Let us define .
.
When , .
When , , which is when and otherwise.
When , , which is when and otherwise.
So, .
Let us see that adds the -th row multiplied by to the -th row.
.
When , .
When , .
That means that the -th row multiplied by is added to the -th row.
Let us see that .
Let us define as with replaced by .
.
When , .
When , ; when , ; when , ; otherwise, .
So, .
.
When , .
When , ; when , ; when , ; otherwise, .
So, .
Let us see that replaces the -th row by the -th row multiplied by plus the -th row multiplied by and replaces the -th row by the -th row multiplied by plus the -th row multiplied by .
.
When , .
When , . Especially, .
When , . Especially, .
That means that the -th row is replaced by the -th row multiplied by plus the -th row multiplied by and the -th row is replaced by the -th row multiplied by plus the -th row multiplied by .
Let us see that .
Let us define as with replaced by , replaced by , replaced by , and replaced by .
This will be used later: from , , which implies that by the proposition that the cancellation rule holds on any integral domain.
.
When , .
When , ; when , ; when , ; otherwise, .
So, .
.
When , .
When , ; when , ; when , ; otherwise, .
So, .
Let us see that multiplies the -th column by .
.
When , . When , .
That means that only the -th column is multiplied by .
Let us see that .
Let us define as with 1 replaced by .
is the same with the case.
Let us see that swaps the -th column and the -th column.
.
When , .
When , .
When , .
That means that the -th column and the -th column are swapped.
Let us see that .
Let us define .
is the same with the case.
Let us see that adds the -th column multiplied by to the -th column.
.
When , .
When , .
That means that the -th column multiplied by is added to the -th column.
Let us see that .
Let us define as with replaced by .
is the same with the case.
Let us see that replaces the -th column by the -th column multiplied by plus the -th column multiplied by and replaces the -th column by the -th column multiplied by plus the -th column multiplied by .
.
When , .
When , . Especially, .
When , . Especially, .
That means that the -th column is replaced by the -th column multiplied by plus the -th column multiplied by and the -th column is replaced by the -th column multiplied by plus the -th column multiplied by .
Let us see that .
Let us define as with replaced by , replaced by , replaced by , and replaced by .
This will be used later: from , , which implies that by the proposition that the cancellation rule holds on any integral domain.
.
When , .
When , ; when , ; when , ; otherwise, .
So, .
.
When , .
When , ; when , ; when , ; otherwise, .
So, .
References
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>