693: For Open Subset of -Dimensional Euclidean Manifold, Map into -Dimensional Euclidean Manifold Divided by Never-Zero Map into 1-Dimensional Euclidean Manifold Is
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>
description/proof of that for open subset of -dimensional Euclidean manifold, map into -dimensional Euclidean manifold divided by never-zero map into 1-dimensional Euclidean manifold is
Topics
About:
manifold
The table of contents of this article
Starting Context
Target Context
-
The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any open subset of the -dimensional Euclidean manifold, any map into the -dimensional Euclidean manifold divided by any never-zero map into the 1-dimensional Euclidean manifold is .
Orientation
There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.
There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.
Main Body
1: Structured Description
Here is the rules of Structured Description.
Entities:
:
:
:
:
: ,
: ,
//
Statements:
//
2: Natural Language Description
For the Euclidean manifold, , any open subset, , the Euclidean manifold, , the Euclidean manifold, , any map, , and any map, , if is never zero on , is a map.
3: Proof
Whole Strategy: Step 1: prove the proposition that is and the derivative is a map divided by a never-zero map; Step 2: prove by induction the proposition that is and the -th derivative is a map divided by a never-zero map; Step 3: conclude that proposition of this article.
As is described in Note for the definition of map from open subset of Euclidean manifold into subset of Euclidean manifold at point, where excludes and includes , cited in the definition can be taken to be . So, we do so hereafter.
Note that the superscripts like hereafter except denote the -th components, not powers.
Step 1:
Let us prove the proposition that is and the derivative is a map divided by a never-zero map.
On , , which is continuous because , , , , and are continuous and is never zero. is , because , , , and are . is never-zero .
So, the proposition has been proved.
Step 2:
Let us prove by induction the proposition that is and the -th derivative is a map divided by a never-zero map.
For , the proposition of Step 1 has proved it.
Let us suppose the proposition through and think of .
Let the -th derivative be . satisfies the condition of the proposition of Step 1, so, it is and the derivative is a map divided by a never-zero map. That means that is and the -th derivative is a map divided by a never-zero map.
So, the proposition has been proved.
Step 3:
The proposition of Step 2 immediately implies the proposition of this article.
References
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>