2024-07-14

675: Complementary Subspace of Vectors Subspace

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

definition of complementary subspace of vectors subspace

Topics


About: vectors space

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a definition of complementary subspace of vectors subspace.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Structured Description


Here is the rules of Structured Description.

Entities:
F: { the fields }
V: { the F vectors spaces }
V: { the vectors subspaces of V}
V~: { the vectors subspaces of V}
//

Conditions:
VV~={0}

V=V+V~
//

V=V+V~ means that vV(vV,v~V~(v=v+v~)).


2: Natural Language Description


For any field, F, any F vectors space, V, and any subspace, VV, any subspace, V~V, such that VV~={0} and V=V+V~


3: Note 1


The decomposition, v=v+v~, is inevitably unique, because if v=v1+v1~=v2+v2~, v1v2=v2~v1~, but the left hand side is an element of V and the right hand side is an element of V~, so, it is in VV~={0}, so, v1v2=v2~v1~=0, so, v1=v2 and v1~=v2~.


4: Note 2


There can be multiple complementary subspaces for the same vectors subspace, because for example, V is the span of the basis, {e1,e2}, V is the span of the basis, {e1}, and the span of the basis, {e2}, is a complementary subspace of V, but also the span of the basis, {e1+e2}, is a complementary subspace of V.


5: Note 3


V~ does not need to be "perpendicular" to V in order for it to be a complementary subspace of V. In fact, "perpendicular" is defined only when inner product is defined on V, and inner product is not required for the concept of complementary subspace.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>