description/proof of that for integral domain, if least common multiples of subset exist, they are associates of a least common multiple
Topics
About: ring
The table of contents of this article
- Starting Context
- Target Context
- Orientation
- Main Body
- 1: Structured Description
- 2: Natural Language Description
- 3: Note
- 4: Proof
Starting Context
- The reader knows a definition of integral domain.
- The reader knows a definition of least common multiples of subset of commutative ring.
- The reader knows a definition of associates of element of commutative ring.
- The reader admits the proposition that the cancellation rule holds on any integral domain.
Target Context
- The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any integral domain and any subset, if the least common multiples of the subset exist, they are the associates of a least common multiple.
Orientation
There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.
There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.
Main Body
1: Structured Description
Here is the rules of Structured Description.
Entities:
//
Statements:
//
2: Natural Language Description
For any integral domain,
3: Note
This proposition is not claiming that such an
4: Proof
Let us suppose that there is an
When
Let us suppose that
Let
Let us prove that
When
When
Let us prove that for each unit,
For each
Let us prove that each