2023-09-10

362: There Are Rational and Irrational Dedekind Cuts Between 2 Dedekind Cuts

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

A description/proof of that there are rational and irrational Dedekind cuts between 2 Dedekind cuts

Topics


About: set

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any 2 Dedekind cuts, there are a rational Dedekind cut and an irrational Dedekind cut between them.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Description


For any Dedekind cuts r1~,r4~, such that r1~r4~, there are a rational Dedekind cut, r2~, such that r1~r2~r4~ and an irrational Dedekind cut, r3~, such that r1~r3~r4~.


2: Proof


Note that for any rational number, r denotes the rational number regarded as a rational number; r~ denotes the Dedekind cut of r regarded as a real number; any irrational number is always denoted as r~, because it is always as a Dedekind cut.

There is a rational number, q2, such that q2r1~ and q2r4~. There is a rational number, q2, such that q2<q2r4~, because r4~ does not have any largest element, by the definition of Dedekind cut. q2~={qQ|q<q2}. q2~r4~, because r4~ contains all the rational numbers smaller than q2, but q2 is contained only in r4~. r1~q2~, because q2~ contains all the rational numbers smaller than r1~, but q2 is contained only in q2~. r2~ can be taken to be q2~.

As a fact that will be used repeatedly hereafter, for any real numbers, r~,r~, such that 0r~<r~, there is a rational number, q, such that r~<q~2<r~, because r~<r~ (the existences of the square roots are presupposed) and there is a rational number, q, such that r~q~r~, by the previous paragraph, and r~r~q~q~r~r~, so, r~<q~2<r~.

Let us find an irrational Dedekind cut, r3~, such that r1~r3~r2~.

Let us suppose that 0<r2~. If r1~<0, we will take r1~=0, and otherwise, r1~=r1~, so, 0r1~<r2~. There is a positive rational number, q3, such that r1~2<2q3~2<r2~2, because it is equivalent with r1~22<q3~2<r2~22. Then, define r3~:={qQ|(q<0)(0qq2<2q32)}.

r3~ is a Dedekind cut, because r3~ and r3~Q and if qr3~, for any q<q, qr3~, and r3~ does not contain any largest element (for any q such that q2<2q32, there is a q such that q2<q2<2q32). The complement of r3~ is {qQ|0q2q32q2}, which does not have any smallest element as there is no q that satisfies 2q32=q2 (for any q such that 2q32<q2, there is a q such that 2q32<q2<q2), which means that r3~ is an irrational number.

r1~r3~r2~, because while r1~r3~r2~ is obvious, there are q,q such that r1~2<q~2<r3~2<q~2<r2~2, and qr1~, qr3~, qr3~, and qr2~.

Let us suppose that r2~0. Then, r1~<r2~0. There is a negative rational number, q3, such that r2~2<2q3~2<r1~2. Then define r3~:={qQ|q02q32<q2}.

r3~ is a Dedekind cut, because r3~ and r3~Q and if qr3~, for any q<q, qr3~, and r3~ does not contain any largest element (for any q such that 2q32<q2, there is a q such that 2q32<q2<q2). The complement of r3~ is {qQ|(0<q)(q0q22q32)}, which does not have any smallest element as there is no q that satisfies q2=2q32 (for any q such that q2<2q32, there is a q such that q2<q2<2q32), which means that r3~ is an irrational number.

r1~r3~r2~, because while r1~r3~r2~ is obvious, there are negative q,q such that r2~2<q~2<r3~2<q~2<r1~2, and qr1~, qr3~, qr3~, and qr2~.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>