362: There Are Rational and Irrational Dedekind Cuts Between 2 Dedekind Cuts
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>
A description/proof of that there are rational and irrational Dedekind cuts between 2 Dedekind cuts
Topics
About:
set
The table of contents of this article
Starting Context
Target Context
-
The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any 2 Dedekind cuts, there are a rational Dedekind cut and an irrational Dedekind cut between them.
Orientation
There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.
There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.
Main Body
1: Description
For any Dedekind cuts , such that , there are a rational Dedekind cut, , such that and an irrational Dedekind cut, , such that .
2: Proof
Note that for any rational number, denotes the rational number regarded as a rational number; denotes the Dedekind cut of regarded as a real number; any irrational number is always denoted as , because it is always as a Dedekind cut.
There is a rational number, , such that and . There is a rational number, , such that , because does not have any largest element, by the definition of Dedekind cut. . , because contains all the rational numbers smaller than , but is contained only in . , because contains all the rational numbers smaller than , but is contained only in . can be taken to be .
As a fact that will be used repeatedly hereafter, for any real numbers, , such that , there is a rational number, , such that , because (the existences of the square roots are presupposed) and there is a rational number, , such that , by the previous paragraph, and , so, .
Let us find an irrational Dedekind cut, , such that .
Let us suppose that . If , we will take , and otherwise, , so, . There is a positive rational number, , such that , because it is equivalent with . Then, define .
is a Dedekind cut, because and and if , for any , , and does not contain any largest element (for any such that , there is a such that ). The complement of is , which does not have any smallest element as there is no that satisfies (for any such that , there is a such that ), which means that is an irrational number.
, because while is obvious, there are such that , and , , , and .
Let us suppose that . Then, . There is a negative rational number, , such that . Then define .
is a Dedekind cut, because and and if , for any , , and does not contain any largest element (for any such that , there is a such that ). The complement of is , which does not have any smallest element as there is no that satisfies (for any such that , there is a such that ), which means that is an irrational number.
, because while is obvious, there are negative such that , and , , , and .
References
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>