2023-09-10

365: C^\infty Vectors Field Is Uniquely Defined by Its C^\infty Metric Value Functions with All C^\infty Vectors Fields

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

A description/proof of that C vectors field is uniquely defined by its C metric value functions with all C vectors fields

Topics


About: Riemannian manifold

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any Riemannian manifold, the set of any C metric value functions with respect to all the vectors fields defines a unique C vectors field.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Description


For any Riemannian manifold, M, any C(M) linear map, f:X(M)C(M) defines the unique C vectors field, VX(M), such that V,V=f(V).


2: Proof


Around any point, pM, let us take a chart, (Up,ϕp), such that (1,2,...,n) is an orthonormal frame, which is possible by the proposition that around any point on any Riemannian manifold, there is a chart whose canonical frame is orthonormal. Let us define Vi:=f(i) and V:=Vii. V=Vii. V,V=iViVi=if(i)Vi=f(iVii)=f(V). So, there is such a V on Up that satisfies the condition.

For any pUp, supposing that there is another V by another chart that contains p, taking V such that Vi=1 and Vj=0 for ji at p (there is V such that Vi=1 and Vj=0 for ji on Up, and there is such a V on M, by the proposition that for any C vectors field on any point neighborhood of any C manifold, exists a C vectors field on the whole manifold that equals the original vectors field on a possibly smaller neighborhood of the point), V,V|p=Vi(p)=f(V)(p)=f(i)(p), so, that another V coincides with V in the previous paragraph on the intersection. So, V is well-defined on whole M.

As V is locally a C vectors field around any point on M, V is C on whole M.

V is unique, because in whatever way it is constructed, it has to satisfy Vi=f(i) on Up, so, that V equals our V on any Up, so, on whole M.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>