2023-04-09

252: Products of Sets Are Associative in 'Sets - Map Morphisms' Isomorphism Sense

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

A description/proof of that products of sets are associative in 'sets - map morphisms' isomorphism sense

Topics


About: set

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that the nested product of any sets are associative in the 'sets - map morphisms' isomorphism sense.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Description


For any sets, S1,S2,S3, the nested product, (S1×S2)×S3 is 'sets - map morphisms' isomorphic to S1×(S2×S3).


2: Proof


(S1×S2)×S3={s|s1S1,s2S2,s3S3,s=s1,s2,s3} is obviously not exactly S1×(S2×S3)={s|s1S1,s2S2,s3S3,s=s1,s2,s3}, but f:(S1×S2)×S3S1×(S2×S3),s1,s2,s3s1,s2,s3 is a bijection.


3: Note


Although sloppy expressions like "(S1×S2)×S3=S1×(S2×S3)" are prevalently seen, the 2 are not the same, but are isomorphic to each other.

The expression, S1×S2×S3, is allowed because it is defined as (S1×S2)×S3, not because "(S1×S2)×S3=S1×(S2×S3)" holds.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>