217: Union of 2 Connected Subspaces Is Connected if Each Neighborhood of Point on Subspace Contains Point of Other Subspace
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>
A description/proof of that union of 2 connected subspaces is connected if each neighborhood of point on subspace contains point of other subspace
Topics
About:
topological space
The table of contents of this article
Starting Context
Target Context
-
The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that for any topological space, the union of any 2 connected subspaces is connected if each neighborhood of a point on one of the subspaces contains a point of the other subspace.
Orientation
There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.
There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.
Main Body
1: Description
For any topological space, , and any connected subspaces, , is connected if there is a point, , whose each neighborhood, , contains a point on .
2: Proof
Suppose that there is such a point, . Suppose that was not connected. , where would be nonempty open on , and where would be open on . Without loss of generality, . would be a neighborhood of , so, would contain a point, . , as would contain and would contain . . and would not share any point on , because otherwise, and would share the point. As would be connected, would have to be empty as . So, would have to contain a point of , but then, , a union of disjoint nonempty open sets, because and would not share any point on , a contradiction. So, is connected.
References
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>