2022-04-10

270: 2 Points on Connected Lie Group Can Be Connected by Finite Left-Invariant Vectors Field Integral Curve Segments

<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>

A description/proof of that 2 points on connected Lie group can be connected by finite left-invariant vectors field integral curve segments

Topics


About: Lie group
About: vectors field

The table of contents of this article


Starting Context



Target Context


  • The reader will have a description and a proof of the proposition that any 2 points on any connected Lie group can be connected by a finite number of segments each of which is of an integral curve of a left-invariant vectors field.

Orientation


There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.

There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.


Main Body


1: Description


For any connected Lie Group, G, any 2 points, p1,p2G, can be connected by a finite number of segments each of which is of an integral curve, γi:RG, of a left-invariant vectors field, Vi.


2: Proof


As G is a C manifold and is connected, it is path-connected, so take a path, γ1:[r1,r2]G, that connects e to p1 as the terminals where e is the unit point of G. There are a neighborhood, U0, on the Lie algebra, g, and a neighborhood, Ue, on G such that the exponential map, exp:U0Ue, is a diffeomorphism. At any point, piG, Upi:={p|pi1pUe} is an open set because it is the preimage of Ue by the C map, f:GG,ppi1p. For any pUpi, there is a vector, lpi,eVe, at pi such that the integral curve of the left-invariant vectors field, V, starting at pi passes p, because by choosing Ve as pi1p=expVe, p=piexpVe=ϕ1(pi) by the proposition that the integral curve of any left-invariant vectors field starting at any point on any Lie group is the integral curve of the vectors field starting at e, left-multiplied by the point. Now, γ1 can be covered by such open sets, and as the path is compact, there is a finite sub cover, Up10=Ue,Up11,...,Up1k,Up1k+1=Up1. Up10 shares a point with one of the rest open sets, because otherwise, in the γ1 subspace topology, Ua0:=Up10γ1 and Ur0:=(1i10Up1i)γ1 are open and they would be disjoint and Ua0Ur0=γ1, which means that γ1 would be disconnected, a contradiction (γ is connected as a continuous image of the connected [r1,r2]). Denoting one of the possibly multiple sharing open sets by Up1c1 and the shared point by p1s1, p1s1 is in Up10 and so can be connected to e by the integral curve of a left-invariant vectors field and is also in Up1c1 and so can be connected to p1c1 by the integral curves of a left-invariant vectors field; if p1c1=p1, e is already connected to p1, if not, Up10Up1c1 shares a point with one of the rest open sets and denoting one of the possibly multiple sharing open sets by Up1c2 and the shared point by p1s2, p1s2 is in Up10 or Up1c1 and so can be connected to e or p1c1 and is also in Up1c2 and so can be connected to p1c2; if p1c2=p1, e is already connected to p1 directly or via p1c1, if not, Up10Up1c1Up1c2 shares a point with one of the rest open sets . . ., and so on; after all, e is connected to p1 by some finite number of segments because Up1ci becomes Up1 sometime in the finite iteration. Likewise, e is connected to p2 by some finite number of segments each of which is of an integral curve of a left-invariant vectors field. p1 can be connected to p2 via e.


References


<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>