278: Equivalence Between Derivation at Point of C^1 Functions and Directional Derivative
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>
A description/proof of equivalence between derivation at point of functions and directional derivative
Topics
About:
manifold
The table of contents of this article
Starting Context
Target Context
-
The reader will have a description and a proof of the equivalence between any derivation at point of functions and the corresponding directional derivative.
Orientation
There is a list of definitions discussed so far in this site.
There is a list of propositions discussed so far in this site.
Main Body
1: Description
For any manifold, M, any point, , the set, , of derivations at p of functions, and the set, , of directional derivatives, the map, , on any chart where is any combination of real numbers, is an isomorphism, which does not really depend on the choice of the chart, with the same result on any function.
2: Proof
Any directional derivative can be represented by with the unique , because only the tangent of the curve at p matters. is a derivation at p, because , satisfying the Leibniz rule. The map is an injection, because for 2 distinct and with f as , the results are and , which differ for an i. The map is a surjection, because by Tailor's theorem with reminder, any function, f, satisfies where . Applying any derivation at p on the both sides, . So, any derivation at p can be expressed as with .
The result of any derivation is the same with that of the corresponding directional derivative, because by the chain rule.
The isomorphism does not depend on the choice of chart, because directional derivative does not depend on the choice and derivation equals the choice-independent directional derivative.
3: Note
Derivation at point of functions is equivalent with directional derivative with the domain restricted to functions, because as any function is a function, the map, , works for any function, the injectivity and the surjectivity are intact (because the materials used in the proof for functions can be used also for this case: is as well as and the Tailor theorem works for functions, which are functions), and the both sides yields the same result with the domains just restricted. We have to say "directional derivative with the domain restricted to functions", because cannot be said to be exactly equivalent with .
References
<The previous article in this series | The table of contents of this series | The next article in this series>